Thursday, Oct 04, 2012 at 13:30
Hullo Robin
You raise an issue that is a little more complex than you seem to imply - fuel excise, who pays and where is it spent.
Just to touch on a few points. Firstly, the excise raised that could be attributed to travel on rural roads, including highly trafficked rural freeways such as the Hume,
Pacific and Bruce Hwys, barely starts to cover their cost, both contruction and maintenance. The fact is that rural roads are heavily subsidised by excise on the fuel used in urban travel. This fuel excise is collected at the Federal level.
Secondly, there are three tiers of govt in
Australia responsible for road construction and maintenance, namely, the Commonwealth for the national hwy system, state govt the main road system and local govt the local road system. Whilst local govt is responsible for a significant percentage of the total length, they are generally lower cost roads. However, local govt in rural areas generally have a lower tax base.
To the case in point.
Warren Gorge is not a Commonwealth or state responsibility; it is maintained by the local council. They have installed a (relatively) new abultions building on the right as you enter the camping area and regularly keep it clean, empty the bins, grade the roads and keep the place tidy. For my part, I have no problem what so ever in paying the minimal fee of $7 / night to camp there.
If you do want to get excited, note that as well as the excise on diesel, there is a 18c/l levy to pay for the damage to roads attributed to heavy vehicles. This was introduced instead of the old log book based method and is a more efficient way of collection as well as reducing the avoidance endemic in the old system. The issue here is that all diesel sold through the public service station network is levied, including that sold to light vehicles, even though light vehicles including 4WDs contribute very little to pavement damage due to their axle weight (damage increases as to the 4th power of weight and so really only starts to become an issue after about 3 or more tonnes per axle. Given the increased percentage of light vehicles now powered by diesel engines, there is real case for devising a practical way of making sure only heavy vehicles pay this levy. This would restore the cost difference previously enjoyed by diesel.
Maybe start talking to your local federal member! :-)
Cheers
Andrew
FollowupID:
771765