Wednesday, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:40
I’ve followed the general RV / Caravan Park story with interest because it is going to have a substantial impact on tourism
infrastructure in this country. And worth noting, with the Australian dollar at current levels, the higher proportion of people travelling overseas and less inbound tourists, we are likely to see substantially less capital investment in tourism
infrastructure in any case.
The issue is there has been a fundamental shift in what a caravan park is today, what it offers, and the price at which it can do this. On the one hand, increasing land valuations, and council rates means that they can no longer survive the old style model of mum and dad and the kids holidaying for 4 weeks a year at $10 per night. To attract a wider audience they have had to make substantial improvements and become resort style parks, providing a wider range of holiday inclusions apart from a
toilet and shower block. For some they have been able to make this transition, for many (perhaps most) it hasn’t or won’t be financially viable to do so.
On the other hand a developing RV industry, that has sold people on a complete package of vans and vehicles that can self-support for extended periods, are not willing to pay the price required to stay in the caravan parks, but they still have a requirement to be able to service their vehicles in terms of black and
grey waste, and replenish supplies, and in some cases provide an area where they can stay and have ‘safety in numbers’.
The RV Association has been quite vigorous in terms of its promotion of the benefits to local councils and the need to be an ‘RV Friendly’ town in order to gain their support. This means providing
services that are in many ways are in direct competition to caravan parks, but based on a model of ‘rate-payers’ subsidise our costs on the basis we will spend money in your town. I’m not sure what studies have been done on the cost/benefit of this, but I suspect there will be a huge discrepancy between towns based on their size. The larger centres that provide access to the major super market chains, and a large number of service stations providing price tension might do okay, especially given the cost to rate-payers is spread over a larger number, but the story for smaller country towns might be completely different.
Ultimately, there is likely to be a declining investment in caravan parks generally, and pressure will increasingly be placed on local councils to provide facilities for RVer’s in general, but I doubt this will continue to be offered on a no-cost basis. I’m not sure what the model will be going forward, but caravan parks as we know them will all but disappear overtime, and eventually the cost burden of this will shift to the RV community...
But I suspect until the ‘new’ model can be worked out the divide between the vested interests will simply get larger, and the vocalising on both sides will get louder...
Caveat...I’m neither an RV’er or Caravan Park owner...
Good luck out there...
AnswerID:
465644
Follow Up By: Andrew & Jen - Wednesday, Sep 21, 2011 at 13:49
Wednesday, Sep 21, 2011 at 13:49
Hullo The Landy
Another thoughtful and thought provoking input from you, creating a broader context for discussion - thank you.
It seems to me that only a relatively small % of the
population thinks beyond their immediate actions to the longer term consequences.
The above discussion is just another example of the "I'm alright Jack - stuff you" approach - littering, selfish generation of noise, vandalism, wrecking tracks, encroaching on personal space, abuse of private property and so on.
A study from some time back that I have seen indicated that about 8% of the
population are anti-social, in this case (in the report) responsible for about 70% of road incidents.
Regards
Andrew
FollowupID:
739674