Hi tech diesels

Submitted: Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 19:41
ThreadID: 41828 Views:3195 Replies:15 FollowUps:36
This Thread has been Archived
Many contributers to this forum criticize the 3 litre turbo diesels for developing too much power in a small motor, and therefore suffering from stress related failures. What do these blokes think about the new Holden Astra Turbo diesel which produces the same power and significantly more torque than the Nissan 3.0TD . All done with a little 1910cc motor.
Ian
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: wilko65 - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 19:51

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 19:51
Ian,
There are many small engines around producing huge amounts of power with considerably high levels of reliability.
The Cosworth engines in the Ford Siera imported into Australia and raced against the V8 super cars was a classic example. The only way the V8 engines could beat them was to ban them. So we no longer see them race.
The ZD 30 has had some probelms, but the thing that got most Toyota owners annoyed, was that there pathetically slow and fuel hungry 1HZ's couldn't see which way they went. I think they were really glad when they started to blow up.
John
AnswerID: 218872

Follow Up By: Ianw - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 19:58

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 19:58
John
I think you'll find that the Cosworth motors would not be anywhere near as reliable as the Nissan 3.0TD. They are rebuilt after almost any race they do.. Imagine if you had to rebuild your 3.0 after every trip!!
Ian
0
FollowupID: 479310

Follow Up By: madfisher - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:10

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:10
Yes but I have heard of 1hzs doing 500000ks without a rebuild , I know which one I would prefer. I would be a nervous wreck heading out into a desert with a 3lt Nissan
We have a 3lt Patrol auto at work and a d4d Hiace 14 seater and their is no comparsion in performance
Cheers Pete
0
FollowupID: 479318

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:29

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:29
and like the 1HZ's, there are many TD42's doing 600/700,000 without an issue...
With most grenades going at 100,000klms.. say no more.


0
FollowupID: 479320

Follow Up By: Leroy - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 23:15

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 23:15
6-700 this week trucky? Only 500 last week! But remeber to clarify they grenade is the early series 2 3.0....oh and before you say later 3.0 have had issues....there's not many and would amoust be the same amount as 4.2 issues.

Leroy
0
FollowupID: 479343

Follow Up By: Leroy - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 23:16

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 23:16
oh and I also forgot to mention i shudder every time I go offroad off the beaten track.

Leroy
0
FollowupID: 479345

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 23:52

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 23:52
4 new people on the euro forum have rolled up 640k klms 660 and 689k klms which is close to 700k.. :)

As many as 4.2's? ROTFLMAO... Your not captain in a funny hat are you?

few in our club shuddered that much, that they sold their grenades as they had no confidence in them.
0
FollowupID: 479355

Follow Up By: PhilZD30Patrol - Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 16:20

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 16:20
Hi Truckster

You are a classic mate!

I quote "With most grenades going at 100,000 klms. say no more".

Where on earth do you get your information from? I assume you mean ZD30 engines = grenades?

Could you tell us all the source of this amazing statistic or are you telling us a bit of BULL $#@T.

"Most of them blown up at 100,000 kms" really?

Phil
0
FollowupID: 479482

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 22:43

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 22:43
All the ones you read on here are 70,000 - ~120,000klms.

Try searching with your eyes open.
0
FollowupID: 479593

Follow Up By: Leroy - Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 23:28

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 23:28
read with your eyes open....series 2
0
FollowupID: 479620

Follow Up By: PhilZD30Patrol - Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 08:34

Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 08:34
Hi Truckster and Leroy

You still haven't answered my question

You claim that most, i.e. the vast majority, of 3 litre TD Patrols that have covered over 120,000 kms will have experienced engine failure. Please advise your source of information.

Cheers
Phil
0
FollowupID: 479657

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 17:45

Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 17:45
You really are blind arent you?

0
FollowupID: 479819

Follow Up By: Leroy - Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 19:34

Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 19:34
Yawn....no tired really hearing the same old record.

Leroy
0
FollowupID: 479840

Reply By: Wayne (NSW) - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 19:53

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 19:53
Ian,

I think that Nissan should get there act together and produce a 1000cc turbo diesel motor that will blow the socks off the best diesel turbo motor ever put into a 4WD.

Wayne
AnswerID: 218874

Follow Up By: Rock Ape - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 20:26

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 20:26
Yep I agree, the beauty of a 1lt Nissan motor is they will be cheaper to rebuild after they blowup.

The Ape
0
FollowupID: 479314

Follow Up By: Davo_60 (ACT) - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 20:29

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 20:29
Should be small enough to carry a spare..........
0
FollowupID: 479315

Reply By: Davo_60 (ACT) - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 20:17

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 20:17
We lease a VW golf diesel, very powerful for 2L diesel also. It's great, and it's for the city and major hwy's etc. I'm pretty sure it will not have same engine life as a 4.2 nissan or landcruiser. I don't need a high specific output engine for my 4wd, just something un-stressed that is simple and can be worked on. Horses for courses.
AnswerID: 218878

Reply By: furph - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:23

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:23
Ian. I dont think the blowing up of the zd30 nissan was any real fault of the actual engine mechanicals. I have a friend who's engine holed pistons at 70000km. (2003mod.)
The internals of that motor were in perfect condition, no cylinder bore damage, as new big ends, mains etc., it simply holed 2 pistons. Now if you consider the reciprocating mass of the engine to be one thing, and the electronically controlled fuelling a separate issue, then there is something to point a finger at.
These engines have total electronic control over turbo boost and fuel injection rate. There is no waste gate to control boost pressure, only electronics. In fact some owners with boost guage have reported (on this forum) boost figures approaching 25psi. Now if the electronics say that it needs fuel to match those boost levels something is going to be mightily stretched.
The Europeans have these systems far better sorted out, Nissan failed in this regard.
AnswerID: 218887

Reply By: Stu-k - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:30

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:30
Nissan`s 3lt is not hi tech, nor does it produce much power. Merc diesels %iss all over them 160kw 510 nm out of their 3lt.
AnswerID: 218889

Follow Up By: Ianw - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:40

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:40
The Holden motor realises 57.59 kw per litre of displacement. Makes the Merc look sick at only 53.33 kw per litre.
0
FollowupID: 479321

Follow Up By: Stu-k - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:46

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:46
Newer tech motor, merc engine has been around a few years now so you would hope there would be an improvment, but you could always just chip( which is factory available) the merc motor to 190kw and 630nm.
0
FollowupID: 479322

Follow Up By: F4Phantom - Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 00:17

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 00:17
The new BMW 3.0L TDI has 220kw and more torque than all the supercars in a bathurst lineup. It uses as much fuel as a toyota hybrid in a car that is twice its weight. You could say this engine is overstressed but if you look at bmw engine history, they are the best in the world. (eg in 1990 they had a reliable 2.5L high revving 140kw engine) BUT the proof is in the pudding. Over time we will see which are the good and crap engines, the traditional toyota and nissan engines for example are reliable in their strong points, but thats about it! They use lots of fuel and put out crap power neither of these points impress me. To be fair, i would not want a bmw 220kw engine if its going to need a rebuild every 100,000km, but my money says it will be damn good.
0
FollowupID: 479360

Follow Up By: phil - Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 17:22

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 17:22
Probably the most sophisticated diesel engines today are made by Caterpillar. They use very clever electronic control design to produce emissions which meet the current standards (in the USA. Don't know about Europe). They are renowned for longevity in the trucking industry. They also have been able to dispense with EGR and still meet specs. (See previous threads about EGR)

Electronic controls do not have to be unreliable.

Phil I
0
FollowupID: 479503

Reply By: Ianw - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:32

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:32
It appears that readers have chosen to ignore the original post and try to turn it into a Toyota/Nissan thing. I only used the Nissan 3.0 as an example because it has the same power as the Holden. Toyota-- Nissan who gives a sh. What do people think of the small Holden TD?
Ian
AnswerID: 218891

Follow Up By: Stu-k - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:47

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:47
Probably a good thing apart from the lag
0
FollowupID: 479324

Follow Up By: Richard Kovac - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 22:12

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 22:12
Hi Ian

Power is a made up thing by Mr Watt to sell steam engine's...

Force x Distance = Work

Work / by Time = Power

The smaller engine can spin faster then the larger engine (all the comments above, power need to read these at the same RPM not at peak).

The extra torque (work) will be developed because the engine is more efficient the an older style engine

Force = pressure x area eg. piston diameter squared x .7854 x bang (new smart engine can control the bang longer creating bigger (longer) bangs..

Regards

Richard
0
FollowupID: 479329

Follow Up By: Ianw - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 22:55

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 22:55
I don't think diesel fuel will allow the smaller engine to spin faster. Too slow burning. And as you said smart engines control the bang to last longer, so both the Nissan and the Holden probably rev the same. E.G. Nissan red lines at 4600RPM I think the Holden would too. Nissan max power 110kw at 3600 RPM, Holden 110kw at 4000RPM. ( No intercoolers). Max torque both 2000RPM

Ian
0
FollowupID: 479341

Follow Up By: Richard Kovac - Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 00:23

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 00:23
Hi Ian
nothing to do with fuel just how much energy is in it, The diesel engine has to built robust to counter the high internal pressures to ignite the fuel (some may say different) .

It's a maths thing nothing to do with the brands

Power (watts) = Torque (Nm) x rev/s x 6.2832

I did not make this up I was tort it (not to spell ever)

kw only has one thing to do and that is to pass the TIME of day..

Torque is the main thing you need to look at.

As you show above the Nissan engine has more power than the Holden engine

Holden 110 kW / 4000 rpm x 3600 rpm = 99 kW (you see less power)

If you lighten the fly wheel of the Nissan and maybe a couple of other things, then

110 kW / 3600 rpm x 4000 rpm = 122.22 kW for no more fuel used or maybe as the engine now has to spin more times in one minute. there are no free lunche's

Richard
0
FollowupID: 479361

Follow Up By: Member - andrew G (VIC) - Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 17:45

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 17:45
Gda have to say new holden may be good but on the weekend my 2006 pathy 2.5 diesel towing offroad van 1900kilos. overtook said new holden uphill?? Was flogging the daylights out of pathy but was fun at the time.. Got very dirty look from rodeo driver.. but he was holding up the traffic on two lane overtaking section.. (hopemy new pathy just lasts the distance and doesnt end up like the 3ltr patrol time will tell. But the car makers are doing pretty well with baby motors...
0
FollowupID: 479506

Reply By: Big Kidz (Andrew & Jen) - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:59

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 21:59
I agree with your point Ian. I think that it was an engineering shortcoming that caused the failures and that engineering will progress and we will continue to get more power out of smaller motors. I would imagine that all manufacturers could engineer to a higher level whatever they make - saucepans, kettles, books or cars - and that the durability would improve - but it might be less affordable so they have to make a tradeoff. Sometimes though they cut it a bit fine - like Toyota with my cracked wishbones on the front end.

Andrew
AnswerID: 218895

Reply By: Eric Experience - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 22:04

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 22:04
Ian,
I'm with you on this, Some blame Renault for the problem but they are related to Peugeot who produce the 307 hdi 80kw from 1600 cc .I think the astra is a good car but do you think your local holden dealer will be able to service it? Eric
AnswerID: 218897

Reply By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 22:19

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 22:19
I think your Astra TD would be fine pushing a 1500kg Astra around the streets; But the same motor in a 3000kg Patrol with maybe a 2000kg trailer will be stressed.
AnswerID: 218898

Follow Up By: Leroy - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 23:25

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 23:25
what's the difference between a motor that is stressed and one which is under powered?

Leroy
0
FollowupID: 479346

Follow Up By: Off-track - Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 23:44

Wednesday, Jan 31, 2007 at 23:44
Phil has got it. The difference is how hard the engine has to work in relation to material specs. The 1HZ is obviously underpower by modern standards but even when working hard it doesnt have a high rpm and cylinder temps that will melt the piston material. Chuck a turbo on it and wind up the boost and you will have a hand grenade.
0
FollowupID: 479353

Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 18:08

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 18:08
"what's the difference between a motor that is stressed and one which is under powered?"

Difference is 1200ccs and 2 cylinders. :-)))
0
FollowupID: 479509

Follow Up By: Leroy - Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 19:33

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 19:33
ah so you mean you don't know?

Leroy
0
FollowupID: 479524

Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 20:57

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 20:57
No Leroy, I mean the " difference is 1200ccs and 2 cylinders" or in the case of the Astra, the difference is 2300ccs and 2 cylinders.

Same opinion as V8diesel below.
0
FollowupID: 479541

Follow Up By: Bonz (Vic) - Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 21:39

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 21:39
what's the difference between a motor that is stressed and one which is under powered?

MARKETING!
.
Time is an illusion produced by the passage of history
.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message
Moderator

0
FollowupID: 479556

Follow Up By: Leroy - Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 19:36

Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 19:36
Bzzzzz.....enginerring.

Leroy
0
FollowupID: 479842

Reply By: Member - Phillip S (WA) - Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 00:09

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 00:09
I have followed the woes of the zd30 with interest and can't help but compare the patrol with the navara which share the same engine ( navara has no intercooler), they develop 118 and 112 kw's respectivily now look at the weight of the two vehicles....are they asking too much out of the engine for the patrol?
They have reduced the towing capacity somewhat to cope with engine problems and there have been some other mod's as well I believe...what do you all think?
AnswerID: 218917

Follow Up By: Leroy - Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:18

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:18
I think you not compare banana with banana. Navara has a similar engine but no intercooler as you say and a completely different turbo.

In what way is the towing cap. reduced?

Leroy
0
FollowupID: 479383

Follow Up By: Member - Phillip S (WA) - Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 00:29

Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 00:29
Hi Leroy....they reduced the manual from 3500 to 3200 and the automatic to 2500
according to the specifications published in different 4wd mags and by nissan themselves...regards Phil
0
FollowupID: 479632

Reply By: Kiwi Kia - Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 07:39

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 07:39
Back to the original posting about small lightweight turbo diesel engines;

The Diamond DA42 Twinstar light twin engine aeroplanes use liquid cooled diesel engines. The specific fuel consumption (SFC) is lower per horsepower hour then petrol fed engines. Some light aircraft diesels use kerosene fuel. The modern digital control systems for engines constantly monitor all the critical temperatures etc. and prevent the engines running at temps and loads that could effect engine life. The reliability of these engines is very high, wonder when we will see some of these developements in the automotive industry.
AnswerID: 218937

Reply By: V8Diesel - Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 19:33

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 19:33
You cannot beat cubic inches.

End of story.
AnswerID: 219057

Follow Up By: Leroy - Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 23:32

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 23:32
cubes for what.......xr6 turbo vs v8 hmmmmm so what's the answer?

Now back to the 3.0l I have towed many a load and a few 2.5t+ can't be happier with the perfoemance of the 3.0l

Until you have experience i dont think you can realy comment.

Leroy
0
FollowupID: 479622

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 00:06

Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 00:06
Had experience driving the 3.0. Found it struggles even in neutral from idle until the turbo kicks in. Try it. Hop in and floor the accelerator and you'll see what I mean.

Until you've driven a 7.3 turbo V8 diesel or a big block Dodge V8 I don't think you can really comment.

Some like fish heads and rice, some like steak and three. Dpends on your tastes I suppose.

Once again....... You cannot beat cubic inches.

End of story.
0
FollowupID: 479630

Reply By: Ianw - Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 21:54

Thursday, Feb 01, 2007 at 21:54
Thanx guys, the night was very slow with only about 5 or 6 posts total. Needed something to do.
Ian
AnswerID: 219095

Reply By: NicI - Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 13:40

Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 13:40
Hi Ian,

I agree with you entirely, here are some examples of manufacturers’ latest Td engine specs and vehicle weights. All these engines produce their maximum torque at between 1500-2200rpm, and maximum power at between 3000-3600rpm, which seems nicely low for 4wd use.

Jeep Cherokee 3LV6Td 160Kw/510Nm 1985Kg
BMW X5 3LV6Td 150Kw/480Nm 2105Kg
Audi Q7 3LV6Td 171Kw/500Nm 2295Kg
Mercedes ML280 2.8LV6Td 140Kw/440Nm 2185Kg
Mercedes ML320 3LV6Td 165Kw/510Nm 2185Kg

The stated fuel consumption for these is 9-11L/100Km (obviously more under full load); this has been confirmed by reviews in various car magazines. They seem more powerful and efficient than any of the current LC or Patrol engines below, even though the weights are very similar.

Toyota LC78 C/C 4.2S6Td 122Kw/380Nm 1950 (plus tray)
Nissan Patrol C/C 4.2S6Td 114Kw/360Nm 2015 (plus tray)

As far as I know the fuel usage of the Patrol/LC engines is ~14L/100Km, so the fuel saved by the more efficient engines is 3L/100Km, which is perhaps a conservative estimate. Over 300,000Km this is 9,000L, which represents ~$12,000 (depending on fuel prices), - enough to pay for a rebuild ? Personally, I'd be happy to pay for a rebuild after 300,000Km or even less in exchange for the extra power and torque, but I doubt these new engines will fail that quickly.

It certainly looks as though the heavy Japanese 4wd's are ripe for some new engines. The question is - when ?

Cheers,

Nic
AnswerID: 219224

Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 14:06

Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 14:06
Nic,
The Japanese motors you have quoted are either no longer in production or about to go out of production. They have been around for 10-15 years.

You could quote the current Pathfinder, Pajero or Prado diesels if you wanted something more valid for comparison.

But I'm quite happy with a reliable commercial vehicle with a 1300kg Payload that quotes 11.6 l/100k, and has max torque at 1400rpm.
0
FollowupID: 479762

Reply By: NicI - Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 14:18

Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 14:18
Hi PhilG,

Do you know when the new engines will be announced, specifically for the C/C models ?

Cheers,

Nic
AnswerID: 219240

Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 15:51

Friday, Feb 02, 2007 at 15:51
Toyota will release the TDi V8 79series Cab chassis on March 23. It was rumoured to be on show from Today at the Brisbane motor show.

I haven't been following the Nissan C/C developments but people are suggesting the ZD30 may appear to replace the 4.2 or maybe they have a bigger donk up their sleeve.
0
FollowupID: 479794

Sponsored Links