Tuesday, Dec 28, 2021 at 15:46
William
Something I didn't mention earlier is the Triton, rear axle to tow ball distance, is/appears to be a large amount in proportion to other similar vehicles, possibly you haven't considered this. That allows the tail to wag the dog with more leverage being in the design. The dog should always be in charge of the tail. All ok if things don't get out of whack.
If using a van and also leveling devices, the Triton has more chassis bending/fracture forces applied to it by that overhang amount. Just because it drives ok doesn't prevent issues in some circumstances later in it's use.
Although extreme loading with Campers on cab chassis, APOLLO had many many Tritons break their backs. General use ok though. I see some newer tradie ones around me and they appear to have bent chassis. Weight too far aft on overhang. Tray points down on a few. Just my viewpoint, simply stating the way it is.
The Triton has a wheelbase of
Triton 3000mm and more axle to ball than all.
Dmax 3125
Ranger 3220
The Dmax and
Ranger have more inherent directional stability, if similar overhang to ball. The Triton has less stability and more overhang. Two factors less capable! This is with equally performing shocks. tyres and springing and drivetrain/power. The Triton will Wallow/Porpoise more than the others too.
FollowupID:
917765