Tuesday, Jun 05, 2012 at 19:57
Hi Ron,
To tell you the truth I am not at all surprised that Hon.
David Wynford Carnegie is not mentioned.
When one starts to sift through all the available information available be it internet, books or archives with a view perhaps to providing some sort of summary on the issue, the names of the
explorers mentioned in this article are very often the most popular.
For obvious reasons exploration started from
Sydney, and then as other settlements developed, they became the starting and finishing points of various expeditions.
Soon it was a duel between Victoria and South Australia as to who who crossed the middle first and then most of the usable continent was mapped. Yet not the interior of Western Australia.
So come along David
Carnegie, who noticed when he got here in the 1890's that the interior of WA had yet to be mapped properly. He grabs four men and a black boy and goes off to have a look and reaches
Halls Creek from
Coolgardie only to realise he hasn't scratched his itch so he comes back again by a different route (briefly going into the Northern Territory of South Australia east of
Lake MacDonald).
Well it's a little too late Mr.
Carnegie; he obviously didn't realise that the bureaucrats and the professors sitting in there nice comfortable leather chairs overlooking
Sydney Harbour had already written "The Exploration of Australia", and there was no room for anymore, especially those convict tarnished, barbarians west of longitude 129 and that of
Perth and the Swan River Colony.
So that's my take on it Ron, can't really blame Michelle here.
If there is something I would like to change about this article, it would be the main image of that W.J. Wills and that other fool. I beg Michelle to change it to an image more worthy.
I must admit I haven't studied the Wills and Burke Expedition intensively, really only read two or three books on it however one things for sure, Burke was an idiot.
J.M.R. Cameron sums up my point of view perfectly in the first paragraph of the introduction of "The Finest Goldfields in the World" by Hesparian Press.
"Accounts of exploration typically concentrate on the expedition itself or on the expedition and its immediate aftermath. Accounts of Australian exploration seem particularly oriented this way, perhaps because our
explorers have always been portrayed as heroes pitting their skills and their
well against a hostile, unforgiving environment. Clearly, there is an underlying truth here because the notable Australian explorations do have a heroic quality,probably more pronounced the less competent the explorer was. The disastrous sorties by George
Grey or Burke and Wills and the benign way they have been treated in the historical record readily spring to mind. They form part of our gallery of glorious if somewhat flawed heroes who occupy their pedestals at the expense of others like the Forrests or the
Gregory Brothers or the countless unnamed shepherds, drovers, and prospectors whose assessments of the continent's resources were carried out with the minimum of fuss or difficult and whose achievements were ultimately of far greater significance."
Cheers
Alan
AnswerID:
487746
Follow Up By: ExplorOz - Wednesday, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:02
Wednesday, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:02
teehee..
well you'll like the update I did yesterday then Alan...not sure I"m 100% finished yet though. MM
FollowupID:
763024
Follow Up By: equinox - Wednesday, Jun 06, 2012 at 12:11
Wednesday, Jun 06, 2012 at 12:11
Well there you go!! Thanks for the update Michelle.
Sorry for the couple of historical and grammatical errors in my post - it was written in a "burst" of passion, and I forgot to proof read before I posted.
Cheers
Alan
FollowupID:
763030