Prado 150 or Landcruiser 200?

Submitted: Sunday, May 30, 2010 at 20:55
ThreadID: 78912 Views:33034 Replies:9 FollowUps:16
This Thread has been Archived

Related Pages

I am an avid Toyota Fan so don't shoot me down and/or suggest other makes!
We are about to purchase a new one and the good Wife and I cannot agree on which one. We tow a boat regularly , around 13-1400 kgs. Have had a 100 Series. Really would just love a bit of friendly advice/ opinion as to your thoughts on either a Prado Kakadu Diesel, or Landcruiser 200 GXL Diesel. Both in Automatic. They are both similarly priced. The wife likes all the bells and whistles of the Kakadu Prado, whereas I like the sheer grunt of the Cruiser. Does anyone have Fuel Economy rates for the Prado towing? and the same for the 200 Series?
Have seen some awesome footage of the new Prado's 4wd capability.
Many thanks and looking forward to your replies, open mindedly,
Kind regards, Keepingitreal NSW
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Captain (WA) - Sunday, May 30, 2010 at 21:13

Sunday, May 30, 2010 at 21:13
Both are good vehicles, but the 200 has more room and more grunt. No use asking about needing more grunt :) but do you need the room? Must admit I was looking at getting the Prado when I went for a test drive in the TTD V8 and was hooked. Haven't regretted my decision for a second over the last 2 years - and thats after driving the new 150. Either way you won't go wrong!

Cheers

Captain
AnswerID: 418834

Reply By: pling - Sunday, May 30, 2010 at 21:14

Sunday, May 30, 2010 at 21:14
I have had my 200 vx t/d for six months and am very happy.
Love the grunt and handling.
My worst L/per 100 was 18l towing my 30 yacht across Sydney, which trailer and yacht was 3300 kg. Towing half a tonne of hay I average 14.5. Towing an empty 8x5 trailer toGoulburn on cruise control I average 11.9. My first L/C after 3 Patrols and very happy. I had a choice of the new Prado or 200, but could not cope with the lack of power of the Prado. Hope that helps.
AnswerID: 418835

Follow Up By: daverobbo5 - Tuesday, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:46

Tuesday, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:46
That really is outstandly low fuel consumption for a 2700kg car! how much does the 4700cc v8 cost to service?

do have to do stuff to the injectors at certain intervals?

are tyres really $500 bucks each.
thanks but i drive a falcon and just don't know (about L/C's) ( i know other stuff, well a bit a bit anyway)
0
FollowupID: 689194

Follow Up By: pling - Tuesday, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:12

Tuesday, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:12
Can't give you any answers as it has only had one service, and the company pays the bill.
It has only done 11,000 km's so have not had to touch the injectors and not had to replace a tyre.
The bad point on tyres is the VX model and sahara both have 18'' wheels, not 17'' as the GXL and you can not buy a big range of tyres in 18'' that you can in 17''.

I am very happy with the economy after my 4.8 petrol Patrol, however the Patrol was the best 4wd at the time and gave me 6 years of no repair costs. (Bullet proof)

Time will tell if the the 200 will be the same, but I will enjoy the journey.
0
FollowupID: 689234

Follow Up By: keepingitreal - Tuesday, Jun 01, 2010 at 21:04

Tuesday, Jun 01, 2010 at 21:04
Both have fixed price services for first 6 (60 000km) , $210.
Don't know the difference thereafter though
0
FollowupID: 689326

Reply By: Robin Miller - Sunday, May 30, 2010 at 21:26

Sunday, May 30, 2010 at 21:26
Keep it real ,keepitreal - and be a little skeptical about some of that footage.

The new 150 series still has the same roll problem as other Prado's and tips over at some 42 degrees , less than the crusier and a lot less than Patrols.

I did quite a fair test of the 150 ,and tried to like it as its has some nice features , but quite simply the diesel is way underpowered and seems set up to be replaced by an updated engine in a year or two and you would be kicking yourself afterwards.

Note also the way the rear body comes in giving significant less effective room inside than the patrol let alone the cruiser.

The more stable and genuine torque of the crusier below 1200rpm would win it everday for me.
Robin Miller

Member
My Profile  Send Message

AnswerID: 418839

Follow Up By: Crackles - Sunday, May 30, 2010 at 22:03

Sunday, May 30, 2010 at 22:03
"...tips over at some 42 degrees"
Well Robin just as well then, that 99.99% of Prado drivers never have the need to go past 20 degrees side angle let alone 42 ;-)
Having watched many Prado's in serious action with the lcool group, stability & offroad ability were never an issue & don't expect the 150 series would be much different. For a tow vehicle it would do the job well with sufficient power & it's smaller size (than a 200) would make it a far more user freindly vehicle to drive (& park) around town.
Cheers Craig...
0
FollowupID: 689001

Follow Up By: rags - Sunday, May 30, 2010 at 22:31

Sunday, May 30, 2010 at 22:31
mention the word prado on this forum and it will be a safe bet that Robin will trot out the usual crap "the prado falls over at x degrees" but wait you can get a Pootrol that won't fall over but may in fact self detonate at the sight of an incline.
the Question from a loyal Toyota fan was 200s or 150s, not which nissan to buy.
my opinion a Prado has for the last 13years suited our needs without not one problem,and not once has it ever rolled over and maybe a new one would serve us just as well if i could find the $ and a 200s would be too big for our needs.Which ever you buy i'm sureyou will be happy with it.check out these sites for good specific info.
http://www.pradopoint.com/
http://www.lcool.org/forum/index.php
0
FollowupID: 689011

Follow Up By: Crackles - Sunday, May 30, 2010 at 23:00

Sunday, May 30, 2010 at 23:00
"the usual crap "the prado falls over at x degrees"
It's not crap Rags, Prado's in particular the narrower 90 series do have a slightly lesser rollover angle but then if that was the only criteria we bought 4x4's by we'd even have to sell the Patrols too & all buy soft top Jeep Wranglers ;-))
0
FollowupID: 689016

Follow Up By: Wherehegon - Sunday, May 30, 2010 at 23:10

Sunday, May 30, 2010 at 23:10
Hi Robin should have known you would be along on this subject when it comes to prados !!! and their rolling over. I've had two of them now and a hilux prior, all 3 have managed to stay upright and the hilux did some serious off road stuff which has a narrower track (just) then the prados, and when it comes to the 150 series they are wider then the previous two models. While I agree (as previous posts on this subject) that the patrols are wider track at the end of the day it comes down to the driver, I probably wouldn't be game enough to take any 4wd to its limits before it falls over. The Kakadu is a brilliant piece of machinery with all the bells and whistles not for every body some like to keep it simple for others they want it. Funny you never mention troopys or pajeros, hilux's or any of the narrower vehicles that are quit capable always the prado ?? Just think if you had a narrower prado then the patrol you might have been able to sneak down a narrow lane way the other night and got away from the bloke in his vehicle (ford falcon for memory) he would have wiped out his mirrors on the fences on his way through or not fit at all, just would have had to be careful turning into the lane way so you didnt end up on your side..... LOL Have a good night. Regards Steve M
0
FollowupID: 689017

Follow Up By: keepingitreal - Monday, May 31, 2010 at 01:26

Monday, May 31, 2010 at 01:26
Thanks Robin. Interesting what you say about the Motor change. I forgot to mention that in my original post. A work colleague has on good authority that the Prado will have a New motor by Feb '11, Possibly a Common Rail Diesel V6??. Which yes is another reason for the Cruiser as a purchase now. I would love to wait I guess and see what they are like, but unfortunately we don't have that soret of time frame. Cheers and Thanks for your reply,
Keepingitreal.
0
FollowupID: 689025

Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Monday, May 31, 2010 at 08:11

Monday, May 31, 2010 at 08:11
Hi Guys

What a range of responses to deal with.

Hi Rags
You know its not crap , you simply have to turn to a Toyota website
and look at the specs which show the latest Prado at 42 degrees
and early ones worse, whereas Patrols are 48.
What you get here is reliable verifiable information and any person
considering a purchase should be able to get the undistorted facts.

May be you should read.
http://toyotacustomerstory.blogspot.com/
or this sites thread 57968.


Hi Wherehegon
Every time a question is asked about any car including Troppies etc ,
we answer it with correct information, I think that there are more Prado's
around and so more people ask about it.

Hi Crackles
(How come you posted the last troppy rollover picture - but I seem to get the responses).
Your question of relevance is valid question - "does it matter that they roll more easily ?"
From earlier posts you probably know that we have been in situations where the 6-8 extra degrees would have been the difference, but many people never are thats true.

Previously noted sites show the link is essentially linear (http://www.monash.edu.au/muarc/) and its difficult within the Victorian road stats system to isolate exactly the impact.

This specific question was about suitability for towing - remember that post on this site about a combination Prado/Van going slowly over a slight downhill bend just over the top of a crest.
The whole system rolled as the brakes / ABS appeared to mishandle the situation, I leave out the messy details , but the owner on approaching Toyota was told of 2 similar cases and this was never resolved to my knowledge.

Any person seriously considering this combination needs to be made aware of these things and then make up their own mind in an un-emotional way.

Robin Miller

Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 689042

Follow Up By: rags - Monday, May 31, 2010 at 22:28

Monday, May 31, 2010 at 22:28
Robin
Thanks for your feedback,my issue with the quoting of potential roll over of a prado 42deg as opposed to say a patrol relates the relative interpretaton of the figures.The real difference between say 42deg and 48degs would be approx 180mm difference in rise over 2000mm wide car which could equate with maybe a wrong wheel placement on say a small rock when offroad.To be considering to drive on these type of side slopes would i say be considered foolish.I think most roll overs would involve some form of formed road with far less side slope or camber than say 42 degs ,maybe speed and driver error.It would certainly not be exclusive to only Prados but any or all makes of cars.In fact we had friends who rollled there GQ Patrol out St George qld way years ago and squashed our borrowed engel [never did get to see if it still worked],and the driver will tell you that he made an error,also as a young 17year old with some mates in a hired mini moke out the back country from Byron Bay we rolled what most would say as being a stable car.
I think what would be a good discussion and maybe would be a good new post for you to start is the full list of all vehicles makes and models as may be used by user of this forum and all the statistics as available including roll overs per vehicle conditions contributing factors locations etc. They must be available as a comparison rather than singling out a Prado because the brochure says 42deg .
Robins quote
"What you get here is reliable verifiable information and any person
considering a purchase should be able to get the undistorted facts."
we only seem to be getting the prado fact.
As the original poster asked was an opinion of 2 toyotas to there suitability as tow vehicle and general use.I'm sure both would suit their needs as would some other makes and models and driven safely will not present any potential accidents.
cheers
Russ
0
FollowupID: 689177

Follow Up By: rags - Monday, May 31, 2010 at 22:39

Monday, May 31, 2010 at 22:39
Robin
I ment to say in my above post reply that there is no offence taken and i like reading your input on this forum maybe the only thing missing sometimes is the campfire and a beer as these discussions would be good debates around a camp
Russ
0
FollowupID: 689181

Follow Up By: Wherehegon - Monday, May 31, 2010 at 22:57

Monday, May 31, 2010 at 22:57
Hi Russ, yeah the same from me to Robin (no offence taken or meant), he likes to have a dig about the prados and roll overs but at the end of the day every one is entitalled to there opinion, we dont all some times agree but thats what its all about hence my little joke to Robin at the end he knows what Im talking about (one of Robins posts) Have a great night guys. Regards Steve M
0
FollowupID: 689184

Reply By: Member - Amy G (QLD) - Monday, May 31, 2010 at 08:36

Monday, May 31, 2010 at 08:36
Having seen a 200 out in a 4WD situation last week, I would definitely go the 200- it was incredibly capable. It too appears to have a large number of bells and whistles- but then I am coming from poverty pack 80 series land where there is not a bell nor whistle to be found so perhaps it's all relative.

The only negative of the 200 is that it is very large- I guess it depends whether that phases you or you'd prefer the smaller vehicle. I think both vehicles would be more than adequate to tow 1400kg.

If you ever encounter a 45 degree side slope, well then good luck to you ;) I'm sure you'll be thrilled with whichever vehicle you end up with!
AnswerID: 418881

Reply By: cycadcenter - Monday, May 31, 2010 at 13:52

Monday, May 31, 2010 at 13:52
In regards to the stability of the Prado, just remember that in the USA the Lexus 470 (same as Prado) has had some major problems with their stability control and Toyota was forced to suspend sales until the problem is fixed. Not too sure if it's the same system used on the top of the line Prado models in Oz.

Also there was a fatality a couple of weeks ago on the Bruce Hwy at Mirium Vale when a Prado dropped one wheel of the bitumen and the driver overcorrected and rolled it 4-5 times. The couple were on their way to the Kimberley from the Sunshine Coast.

Bruce
AnswerID: 418914

Follow Up By: Member - Tour Boy ( Bundy QLD) - Monday, May 31, 2010 at 14:28

Monday, May 31, 2010 at 14:28
That was a 120 series gxl and from looking at the crash site on a slight bend, the driver failed to take the curve, clipped a sign swerved and overcorrected. I'm not 100% sure but the sign may have taken out the rear tyre that would have had all the load on it as he overcorrected contributing to the rollover.
It is very sad for the families concerned but don't blame the vehicle all the time as these gismos (VSC which wasn't fitted) can't always prevent driver error.
Cheers,
Dave
2010 Isuzu FTS800 Expedition camper
2015 Fortuner
Had 72 cruisers in my time

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 689077

Reply By: Moose - Monday, May 31, 2010 at 15:13

Monday, May 31, 2010 at 15:13
Is the main purpose as a tow vehicle?
If so typically what sort of terrain, distances etc?
How much offroad and how serious?
Is it only the 2 of you (or are there kids)?
Do you need heaps of internal room?
But the bottom line is - best keep the missus happy or you'll live to regret it! So get the Prado :-)
AnswerID: 418919

Follow Up By: keepingitreal - Monday, May 31, 2010 at 18:10

Monday, May 31, 2010 at 18:10
I'm hearing you Moose, although a week later and the wife will be happy again anyway. Travel long distances as a family ( 2 younger kids), so extra luggage space would be slightly beneficial but Prado probably has enough. Offroad use a bit but certainly not serious every w/e. I was looking at the big picture also for resale, and was thinking the GXL 200 would hold more value, relative, in 4-5 yrs. With the Prado bringing a new motor out in 2011 (supposedly), this could also affect its resale??? I guess I am sold on the Cruiser, but just have to convince the better half. Many thanks for your response. Cheers
0
FollowupID: 689110

Follow Up By: CodMaster - Monday, May 31, 2010 at 19:19

Monday, May 31, 2010 at 19:19
I can't comment much on the LC200 but I can for the Prado. I'm actually going to order one this coming August for delivery n November. Yes delivery will take 12 weeks as confirmed by my dealer. I've taken both the petrol and diesel for a test drive and I'd have to say, I'd be extra cautious when overtaking a truck in the diesel.

Also keep in mind the Prado 150 unlike the 120 has folded rear seats, taking up unncessary space for your 4 person family. It also has a smaller fuel tank as compared to the 120. Just making some observations that may have been overlooked.

The bells and whistles on a Kakadu are much over rated. If you do decide on a Prado, I'd recommend you get the VX instead and put the savings towards some aftermarket accessories. Just depends how deep your pockets are I guess. Resale wise, I believe the lower grades are easier to sell than the Kakadu.

In regards to the rumor of Toyota coming out with a new Diesel engine in 2011, I believe it would affect resale price, however not that much as many people will still be looking for the trusted and proven performance of the d4d. Also the new Diesel would more than likely be relatively more expensive and hence not kill the market for previous Prado models. Have a look at the marginal price of the 120 and the 150. Having said that, people may toss up between a new generation prado GXL, say, and your similarly priced Kakadu, another reason to get a VX. At the end of the day, it's about what makes you happy for what you can afford and what best suits your needs.

I have contacts in Toyota, and none of them know of any Diesel engines being released any time soon, so I wouldn't worry too much about this issue. I certainly am not. There is however a new V6 petrol engine being released in 2012.

Cheers
Will
0
FollowupID: 689127

Reply By: Davo_60 - Monday, May 31, 2010 at 16:06

Monday, May 31, 2010 at 16:06
200 all the way, the Prado is not in the same league in any respect, although they are a nice enough vehicle. You will probably do much better with resale on the 200 diesel also.

Regards,
Dave
AnswerID: 418925

Follow Up By: Berniec - Monday, May 31, 2010 at 18:48

Monday, May 31, 2010 at 18:48
I have had a LC200 GXL since February 2010 and have done 17,000km. My wife loves to drive it whether towing our van (1500kg) or on its own. The power available makes for very easy driving up and own hills and on the flat. The only thing I am disappointed about is the lack of trip computer where the Prado appears to come with many more bells and whistles. I dont think you would be disappointed with a LC200 if you went that way.
0
FollowupID: 689122

Reply By: wdric - Monday, May 31, 2010 at 21:36

Monday, May 31, 2010 at 21:36
You are not realy comparing two similar spec vehicles.
If you compared the Sahara it is a lot dearer.

AS said either way you will not be dissapointed.

Yes the landcruiser will tow heaps beter, but don't worry about a new engine in the prado, When it first came out it was good enough for most people towing a small trailer like you do and 1400kg is still the same weight today. There is always something better coming out.
Go back 60yrs, has a 4wd ever gone backwards as far as the majority of the buyng public are concerned.

If you only tow a small percentage of the km's you travel the prado will be fine.
When was the last time you put your vehicle to it's limits, I doubt most people ever do.

If the prado has more feature you will use more of the time go for it.
AnswerID: 419012

Reply By: Best Off Road - Tuesday, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:27

Tuesday, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:27
Give some consideration to the ridiculous setup of the rear row of seats in the 150 Prado. They are a plainly stupid design should you wish to fit a set of drawers or fridge slide.

They need to be completely removed which takes considerable disassembling of the car.

Cheers,

Jim.

AnswerID: 419062

Sponsored Links