Cruiser vrs Prado

Submitted: Wednesday, Feb 19, 2003 at 19:51
ThreadID: 3453 Views:2283 Replies:6 FollowUps:9
This Thread has been Archived
Don't get me wrong I'm a nissan man, but how can toyota bring out a 4.7 ltr V8 Cruiser with less power then a 4ltr V6 Prado? Seems strange.
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Phil P - Wednesday, Feb 19, 2003 at 21:22

Wednesday, Feb 19, 2003 at 21:22
If you think thats strange, what about Toyota's pricing policy for TD LC 100's - Nearly $18,000 more than the 4.7Ltr V8 LC 100 ?

Or Toyota's policy of servicing their TD every 5,000Klm, when Nissan has a policy of 10,000Klm & Land Rover 10,000Klm.
AnswerID: 13528

Follow Up By: Slunnie - Wednesday, Feb 19, 2003 at 21:59

Wednesday, Feb 19, 2003 at 21:59
The LandRovers under non-arduous conditions will now go 20,000km between services, and yep, thats the diesels!

Slunnie
0
FollowupID: 7922

Follow Up By: Andrew - Wednesday, Feb 19, 2003 at 22:14

Wednesday, Feb 19, 2003 at 22:14
Yep. Strange too how the old Prado GXL T/D is only about $1500 dearer than the petrol model. Me thinks that they are certainly making a killiing on the 100S TD. Dont know why they charge so much for them as they also make a killing on the service so more on the road means $$$$$.

Andrew
0
FollowupID: 7925

Follow Up By: Member - Cruiser1 - Thursday, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:37

Thursday, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:37
Slunnie, do Landrovers last 20,000 kilometres? :)
0
FollowupID: 7944

Follow Up By: Slunnie - Thursday, Feb 20, 2003 at 13:10

Thursday, Feb 20, 2003 at 13:10
LOL - No! They last 2,000,000 kilometres! :-P
0
FollowupID: 7954

Follow Up By: Geoff - Thursday, Feb 20, 2003 at 18:04

Thursday, Feb 20, 2003 at 18:04
I wonder if the $$$$$$$$$$$$huge price difference is to cover any warranty issues that may surface with the new diesel (considering their history)
0
FollowupID: 7984

Follow Up By: Slunnie - Thursday, Feb 20, 2003 at 20:05

Thursday, Feb 20, 2003 at 20:05
Thats a really good point Geoff. I would imaging replacing the bottom end bearings in the 80 series would have been mega expensive. When you consider that almost every other vehicle charges what probably amounts to 1, 2, 3 thousand dollars it makes sense. I would expect Toyota have the problem solved though. $18,000 is a bit irrational though.
Slunnie
0
FollowupID: 7993

Reply By: desert - Wednesday, Feb 19, 2003 at 21:59

Wednesday, Feb 19, 2003 at 21:59
Kw's are largely a con, a way of rating the engine's rate of work. What is more relevent to 4x4ing is torque, and torque at lower rev's. Have another look at the torque figures of the two engines. These are the values that are going to get the truck up the hill or the caravan over the hill etc. Also compare the kw's and NM of the two Toyota's mentioned, the turbo diesel and the V8.
AnswerID: 13535

Reply By: Suzuki Viagra - Friday, Feb 21, 2003 at 00:35

Friday, Feb 21, 2003 at 00:35
Dunno - I use the Kw's too (or maybe even more than the Nm's) - but then with a 1.6 I have to rely on the loud pedal to get me through a lot of things that could be inched through with a big V8.........

The Prado V6 wasn't far behind in Torque figure either - like 20Nm, but at a higher rpm point as expected compared to the 4.7 V8.

Nissan still puts them both to shame though. More capacity, more power and more torque, just not the most cylinders......

Just shows "having a V8" is more important to advertisers - and to certain buyers - than looking at the facts that really matter.

Releasing the 4.7 V8 with only 175kw just seems stupid to me - why do you release a car with 10kw less than your main competitor and then BRAG about it?


AnswerID: 13623

Reply By: Phil G - Friday, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:16

Friday, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:16
If you want more info about the new Prado:
http://www.goauto.com.au/mellor/mellor.nsf/story2/NT01A0E612

With the new Prado being a little bigger, with better motors and a big price advantage, my prediction is that it will outsell the 100 series. The V6 has more power, The 1KZ-TE diesel has a better track record than the 6 cyl TDs, and more torque than the aging 1HZ. And most of the 100 series have IFS. Why buy a 100 series?

AnswerID: 13630

Follow Up By: Coops - Friday, Feb 21, 2003 at 12:56

Friday, Feb 21, 2003 at 12:56
Shame it's predominantly plastic. Not a bad fourbie though and would be quite capable once lifted.
0
FollowupID: 8030

Reply By: Cj - Friday, Feb 21, 2003 at 14:29

Friday, Feb 21, 2003 at 14:29
Off the track a bit but I've always associated the Prados as more of the typical city family conveyance vehicle for frustrated mothers ie. all this brag from the manufacturer of the xtra power is for bitumen huggers - not offroad performance.
As a friend said to me, he's buying one because seating capacity is the same as a cruiser but cheaper to buy and he won't be using it offroad. Also alot less space in the cargo area which he won't need anyway.

Put some quality aftermarket difflocks in a standard large 4x4 (or small one) and it'll get you over the same dune where a V8 is needed.

AnswerID: 13654

Follow Up By: Phil G - Friday, Feb 21, 2003 at 15:42

Friday, Feb 21, 2003 at 15:42
Cj,

I know you're having gentle stir. But, that perception is very common. But its changing. Our 4wd club now has 30 members owning Prados.

They're becoming more popular in clubs because of their offroad capabilities, particularly for desert travel. With plenty of power and less weight they handle sand better than big 4wds (BTW, difflocks are useless on sand). Despite IFS, they have more clearance than any of the other 4wds. If you add the common 40mm lift, and upsize the tyres to 265/75R16, you do even better. My diesel can travel virtually any track in Austalia without extra fuel as it has 159 litres standard (new Prado 180 litres).
They also have a superb record for reliability and haven't been plagued by engine and driveline faults that some of the bigger 4wds have had.

Its got roof gutters, 6 stud wheels, and is dead simple to service DIY.

Main problem with them is the high resale value, if you want a good one second-hand.

Oh, and by the bay, women do like driving them around town. Lucky I don't let my wife drive mine!
0
FollowupID: 8049

Follow Up By: Member - Bob - Saturday, Feb 22, 2003 at 22:32

Saturday, Feb 22, 2003 at 22:32
Are there any mainstream 4WDs released here in the last 10 years that weren't easily capable of desert travel? In my experience in many of Australia's deserts no one in a Mitsu/Nisso/Toyo/Jacko/Landy had a problem, even with 90 L fuel tanks. Vehicle choices in clubs are often dictated by dominant personalities rather than the merits of a particular vehicle. If the bigger 4WDs are being plagued by engine/driveline problems we haven't been hearing about them here. I don't know that difflocks are useless on sand - you need either ETC or difflocks and a lot of discussion has indicated that many would prefer difflocks. Ground clearance in sand? Once the hubs are buried it doesn't matter a great deal if the body is 1 or 10 cm above the sand. Again, ground clearance hasn't been a big issue for any of the mainstream vehicles over the last 10 years.
0
FollowupID: 8166

Reply By: Suzuki Viagra - Friday, Feb 21, 2003 at 18:31

Friday, Feb 21, 2003 at 18:31
I don't let my wife drive my 4wd. Actually I couldnt force my wife to drive my 4wd if I tried.

But at least she prefers it to my Datto 1200 ute, or god forbid, any of the motorbikes.

See, I've never pulled a 200 metre mono in the 4wd with her oin the back seat......
AnswerID: 13684

Sponsored Links