Fuel Imports

Submitted: Monday, May 01, 2006 at 08:13
ThreadID: 33400 Views:1740 Replies:10 FollowUps:12
This Thread has been Archived
Hi,
this question may have been asked in the past but I would like to know what percentage of our fuel is imported and how much produced from our own wells?
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Gramps (NSW) - Monday, May 01, 2006 at 08:25

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 08:25
Ray,

I think you'll find we import around 20 to 30% of our petrol and diesel. Saw this on BP's site somewhere.

Regards
AnswerID: 169966

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Monday, May 01, 2006 at 10:03

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 10:03
so 70-80% is home grown.. yet our arses are bleeding badly.

lovely world eh
0
FollowupID: 425347

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Monday, May 01, 2006 at 17:08

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 17:08
Get used to it Truckie. It's only going to get worse, unfortunately.

Regards
0
FollowupID: 425422

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Monday, May 01, 2006 at 20:58

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 20:58
Yup, been sayin that for long time now...
0
FollowupID: 425474

Reply By: rolande- Monday, May 01, 2006 at 10:05

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 10:05
Just to shift the topic slightly.

We do of course have enough LPG to supply our own needs and cut out the petrol imports, there-by helping most, but the governmet seem to be more interested in creating an ethanol industry which by all reports still has a negative energy value, (0.96 I think, uses more energy to produce than it provides), to keep a small group of lobbyists happy.

Use our own LPG in Australian built vehicles, create local jobs, improve the environment, improve the balance of payments, provide cheaper fuel.

Obviously too easy though.

Sorry to ramble

Rolande
AnswerID: 169986

Follow Up By: Frank3 - Monday, May 01, 2006 at 14:40

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 14:40
Rolande, the US Congress commissioned research into this issue several years ago and the researchers concluded that as a general rule biofuels (i.e. ethanol and biodiesel) return a net positive energy value of 30%.
Frank.
0
FollowupID: 425381

Reply By: Ray Bates - Monday, May 01, 2006 at 10:35

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 10:35
So if we produce 70% to 80% of our own fuel and I beleieve that this could be increased, why are we paying world parity prices? when we could be independent?
I believe that it was Paul Cheeting that first introduced it, probably from pressure from thos gready oil companies but there is no reason why LPG prices should be so high or fluctuate the way they do.
AnswerID: 169991

Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Monday, May 01, 2006 at 12:10

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 12:10
If an Australian company had the choice to sell petrol overseas for a higher price, then they'd go for it. We'll always be linked into teh world price, unfortunately. Now the tax we pay is a different story!
0
FollowupID: 425358

Follow Up By: Patrol22 - Monday, May 01, 2006 at 12:14

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 12:14
Believe it or not - it was our old mate Malcom Fraser who took the decision to go down the world parity pricing line....Keating simply kept it in place as have subsequent governments as there is a HUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE tax incentive for governments to do this.
0
FollowupID: 425360

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Monday, May 01, 2006 at 17:07

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 17:07
Phil G,

As far as selling petrol overseas for a higher price, definitely. Shareholders would crucify their management if they did'nt sell it for the highest possible price.

Petrol/diesel/LPG is going up guys. It is'nt going back to the old days. Get over it.

Regards

ps It hurts my pocket as much as yours but I'm past worrying about what I have no hope of changing.
0
FollowupID: 425421

Follow Up By: robak (QLD) - Tuesday, May 02, 2006 at 09:55

Tuesday, May 02, 2006 at 09:55
Ray,

I agree with gramps here. Your gripe is with the owners of these companies, ie the shareholders, and not so much with the government.

If you could sell your produce overseas for more, why would you sell it in aus for less?

R.
0
FollowupID: 425540

Reply By: Kiwi Kia - Monday, May 01, 2006 at 11:28

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 11:28
Exxon (the worlds largest public owned oil company) made a profit of US$8.4 billion dollars IN THE FIRST THREE MONTHS of this year.

Need we say any more ?

And why do governments give oil companies (and mining companies) such huge tax incentives to write off capital and development expenditure.
AnswerID: 169996

Follow Up By: Member - ROTORD - Monday, May 01, 2006 at 15:22

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 15:22
Hello All

Here we go again ! Profit has to be related to capital invested . If you find out the capital value of Exxon [ its annual report can be found via the New York stock exchange ] , and then measure annual profit as a percentage of capital invested , you will find it will be about 15% . I know this without checking the figures myself because
1 I did this exercise recently with Royal Dutch Shell and they achieved 15% profit last year , and
2 If any major oil company differed greatly from 15% profit , it would be less than 15% and the Chairman would be fired ,

So is 15% a rip off ? Not really . It is the profit target set by NAB and BHP for each of their operating divisions . And would I invest in a company that had a profit of 15% ? Well yes , but that performance wont set the investing world on fire , there are plenty of other competing opportunities .

To the second question . Today , Australia produces 75% of its crude oil and petroleum requirements , and in 2015 will produce 50% of its requirements . Parity pricing , and the total government cost /benefit treatment of oil companies is aimed at encouraging exploration and production . Not to do so would have such disastrous consequences that even a politician notice .

0
FollowupID: 425394

Reply By: Austravel - Monday, May 01, 2006 at 14:14

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 14:14
I though Australia imported all diesel.
AnswerID: 170019

Reply By: Alan S (WA) - Monday, May 01, 2006 at 14:53

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 14:53
Crude Oil produced in different parts of the world is all different. There is a range of different components in oil, Light & Heavy compounds. Diesel is made up of more Heavys than Petrol, and has more lights than say Tar.

Refiners use a mixture of different types to minimise wasteage and to produce the required qtys of final product. The Crude produced in Aust is genrally light crude and has a higher content of lights (and sells for a higher price), as a comparison Middle East crude is heavier (and sells cheaper).

Our imports are usually Heavier oils that is mixed in with our lighter oil to minimise wastage through excessive by products etc.

If we where to stop exporting and only use our own oil for fuel then we would probably pay a higher price due to wastage factors in production. i,e wrong amount of leftovers etc.

As previously said by someone it is a world market and the Oil co's will sell it where they will get the best price.

Also there is a supply chain in oil, there exploration co's, producers, transporters, refinerers, retailers. In some cases they some companies are all of these but there are some that only specialise in sections. The best way of ensuring better pricing is to promote competition between the sections and companies. For example keep the refinerers out of retail and let fair competition exist.

Alan
AnswerID: 170027

Reply By: macca172 - Monday, May 01, 2006 at 16:10

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 16:10
A number of years ago, I lived in Sale VIC. I was lucky enough to go to a presentation given by Esso-BHP and we were told by the presenter that Australia produces 80% of its crude requirements.
I believe that the days of Australia remaining within the parity pricing structure require and immediate review. This current fereal government needs to take a long hard look at this issue, as I am confident that the bowser prices will be without question, a major factor at the next general election.
I fail to understand why political and enviromental factors in other parts of the world, should effect Australia's bowser prices?
Remember when the hurricane hit New Orleans last year and fuel price went up and the excuse was the hurricane, well I heard a commentator on radio suggest that the US government wouldnt be footing the bill for the rebuild, it would be footed via the world motorists via Wall St. If you think about that, it does make some sense.

Macca
AnswerID: 170046

Follow Up By: Member - ROTORD - Tuesday, May 02, 2006 at 09:43

Tuesday, May 02, 2006 at 09:43
Macca , your stats are a bit out of date . We are currently on 75% , but the critical stat is that by 2015 we will be down to 50% . If we went away from parity pricing there wouldn't be any drilling or exploration in Australia unless it was payed for by the taxpayer . Indonesia tried that approach and now they have supply failures . I would rather pay parity than have no fuel .
0
FollowupID: 425537

Reply By: FZJ 80 - Monday, May 01, 2006 at 18:14

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 18:14
Rolande,

Your not ranting, your correct. LPG is a very viable option and being local does help our balance of payments and employment base. Increase use of lpg cars,reduce pollutants and carcinegens in the air we breath. Plus buy aussie cars where possible,it's common sense. Seems the fed govt think everything should be made in china though.

Regards

Greg
AnswerID: 170067

Reply By: Exploder - Monday, May 01, 2006 at 18:41

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 18:41
So how dose the U.S public get it for 99cent’s AUS, which is a rip-off as far as they are concerned?
AnswerID: 170075

Reply By: Truckster (Vic) - Monday, May 01, 2006 at 21:01

Monday, May 01, 2006 at 21:01
Work it out.

China will pay ANY PRICE to get ANY AMOUNT of oil they can get their hands on.

Now, your a business, selling oil.. You can sell to aussie for $20 a barrel, or $77+ to Big Dik Suk in China..

What would you do?
AnswerID: 170115

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Tuesday, May 02, 2006 at 11:51

Tuesday, May 02, 2006 at 11:51
Big Dik Suk - isn't he the dude who's favourite dish is Cream of Sum Yung Gi?
0
FollowupID: 425555

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Tuesday, May 02, 2006 at 11:52

Tuesday, May 02, 2006 at 11:52
Big Dik Suk - isn't he the famous CEO who's favourite dish is Cream of Sum Yung Gi?
0
FollowupID: 425556

Sponsored Links