solenoid dual battery

Submitted: Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 13:48
ThreadID: 23989 Views:4585 Replies:9 FollowUps:25
This Thread has been Archived
I have been advised to buy a Rotronics over a Redarc solenoid, What are others views.
Kelpi
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Steve - Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 14:32

Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 14:32
Kelpi: do a topic search and take a week off work. Plenty of info there, but be warned, it's not exactly a black & white issue. To most of us, anyway. Cheers.
AnswerID: 116374

Follow Up By: Mainey (WA) - Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 17:06

Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 17:06
On the other side of the story, I statred with a solenoid isolator, and now use a Rotronics...
It was proven to me, that because I am using a Deep Cycle aux battery, my solenoid was not fully charging the aux battery, so I changed to a Rotronics, why should I put up with a 90% charged aux Deep Cycle battery..(only 12v NOT 12.8v)

The Redarc web site now confirms the two batteries should be identical.
0
FollowupID: 371891

Follow Up By: Steve - Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 18:52

Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 18:52
I read the debate you were involved in some time ago and i think you were right Mainey. Having said that, I have a Redarc, (which I bought before the penny dropped) which will do the job well enough for me and probably most situations. As usual, it's a case of what to pay for what requirements. How long since you've had your Rotronics?
0
FollowupID: 371907

Follow Up By: Member - Blue (VIC) - Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 19:01

Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 19:01
I'm using a Redarc with an AGM deep cycle and having no problems fully charging the second battery(using a multimeter after 24+ hrs for the battery to settle)I used 12sq.mm wire to carry the charge to the tub on my ute. I do have a mate with the same setup but with a standard deep cycle and he has a hard time maintaining charge in his 2nd batt.
0
FollowupID: 371912

Follow Up By: Mainey (WA) - Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 21:17

Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 21:17
Steve,
Yes, their website was changed a few weeks later!

First isolator I had installed was the solenoid for about one year, then had a piranha DBE150S for about 7 years, now have had my Rotronics for about 3 months, yes I bought the solenoid because it was inexpensive, I knew next to nothing about battery isolator systems at the time and trusted the auto elect to supply and install the correct system for me, he did not sell Piranha or Rotronics systems, so he would not be expected to sell me what he did not stock.

Blue,
Have you put the two vehicles together, side by side and done some actual electrical output testing of the alternator and also the current going into both your and also your mate’s Aux battery with same conditions, eg; period of recharging time before testing and period of time after engine is turned off?
Also the wire size, it is important for it to be large enough so as to avoid voltage drop, that can be ascertained by measuring voltage at various points between alternator and Aux battery, eg; each side of solenoid and both batteries (+) terminals using the same solid earth each time, if possible.
What voltage to you get going into the Aux battery and at the Aux battery after 4 hours resting?
0
FollowupID: 371937

Follow Up By: Member - Blue (VIC) - Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 23:54

Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 23:54
Mainey,
I know I was getting well over 14v(14.5v rings a bell) at the anderson plug where the 2nd batt goes(is removeable from the tub, in a battery box). Battery has been sitting in the garage for a fortnight so I'll measure the v and see what sort of charge it is holding. As for the other vehicle, I know he was frustrated that after a full day of running his fridge(W35l I was running a W110l) we did a 4 hour run(no load on the aux batt) and his v at the battery after about 3 hours of rest was 12.1v. Mine was 12.7. We are both using 100Ah aux batts, purchased about a week apart and fitted on the same day, both using 12sq mm wire, both using 30amp auto reset circuit breakers.
0
FollowupID: 371971

Follow Up By: Mainey (WA) - Thursday, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:30

Thursday, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:30
Blue,
I would think your mate’s battery is "on the way out" if not all ready there.

If it were mine I would have it checked by a 'competent' battery shop, for a deep discharge test and left there to be charged on their equipment overnight.

It is possibly suffering from a bad cell, sulfation or maybe it is not receiving 100% charge due to a variety of reasons.
0
FollowupID: 372507

Follow Up By: Member - Blue (VIC) - Thursday, Jun 23, 2005 at 14:39

Thursday, Jun 23, 2005 at 14:39
Mainey,
I guess his batt is still under warranty if it is stuffed, I've sms'd him to have it checked properly.

Just for the record my batt is holding 12.8v After nearly 3 weeks of rest so I guess my system is working OK.
0
FollowupID: 372523

Follow Up By: Mad Dog (Australia) - Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 10:41

Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 10:41
Mainey, you wrote this:
"The REDARC web site now confirms the two batteries should be identical"

This conflicts with the redarc instruction sheet where it states:

The REDARC smart start can be used with dissimilar batteries. Many of our customers successfully
operate their battery system with a standard cranking battery as a main and a deep cycle battery as the
auxiliary.

Yes that is on the instruction sheet that comes with the redarc isolator when purchased. Also it's on the redarc website.
0
FollowupID: 373771

Follow Up By: Mainey (WA) - Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 14:35

Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 14:35
Mad Dog,
Yes, their web site "may" have conflicting information?
All depending on which page you read L0L

http://www.redarc.com.au/ss_two.pdf

(QUOTE) The REDARC Smart Start isolator is designed to protect the main start battery from going flat so you can always start the vehicle. It also gives you the benefit of switching in a second (auxiliary) battery in parallel when the main start battery comes up in voltage.
The Smart Start isolator acts as a switch that places both batteries in parallel.

Ideally it is BEST to charge two IDENTICAL batteries in parallel.

In practice we have large number of customers that successfully operate their battery system with a crank battery as a main and a deep cycle battery as the second.(end quote)

As can be seen from their new web site they no longer actually RECOMEND using a Deep Cycle battery as they have done in the past!
0
FollowupID: 373796

Follow Up By: Mad Dog (Australia) - Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 14:53

Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 14:53
What do you mean they dont recomend it. It's clearly stated on the instruction sheet and on the new website "The REDARC smart start can be used with dissimilar batteries"
0
FollowupID: 373798

Follow Up By: Mainey (WA) - Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 19:50

Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 19:50
Mad Dog,
yes Redarc state their solenoid can be used with dissimilar batteries, but that is a statement, and not a RECOMMENDATION isn’t it?
However still on the same web site, they state the following;

IDEALLY it is best to charge two IDENTICAL batteries in parallel.

Now that reads more like a RECOMMENDATION doesn’t it!

Yes, it contradicts the previous statement, doesn’t it!

Do you know of any battery manufacturer who ‘recommends’ two different batteries can be charged in parallel, I don’t ??
Do you want me to send to you the email from redarc stating they will change their web site etc etc.??
0
FollowupID: 373827

Follow Up By: Mad Dog (Australia) - Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 20:39

Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 20:39
You seem to be weaving a tangled web Mainey. I'm simply quoting from the instructions that are supplied with the device which state :The REDARC smart start can be used with dissimilar batteries. I notice Pirahina say the same about their isolators also.

I've read the recommendations on battery sites that parallel batteries should be identical but none of them give reasons and weather that pertains to batteries isolated when off charge I don't know. Some sites say that it's not good to parallel batteries identical or not. I found on the web large numbers of people all over the world questioning this advice from battery manufactures when paralleing batteries with similiar charging characteristics, what I didn't find is reasons apart from the sinister. It appears that some yachties have spend thousands replacing batteries when one battery dies beacuse they were advised that all batteries must be indentical and this includes age.

Seems it's not a perfect world like most things compromises must be made. How much we compromise is up to the individual depending on circumstances. With our tiny battery systems I'm not too worried but it's interesting.

0
FollowupID: 373835

Follow Up By: Mainey (WA) - Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 21:38

Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 21:38
Ray,
I have copied this from the Piranha ELECTRONIC Isolator site

However it is ""NOT"" mentioned anywhere on their SOLENOID site

The PIRANHA Electronic Isolator
Control the competition with the Piranha DBE100S or DBE150S electronic isolator.

Piranha's DBE100S and DBE150S offer a modern and reliable solution to auxiliary battery charging and management. These benefits are:
1.
2.
3.
4. ALLOWS the use of DISSIMILAR batteries i.e. age, design or size. e.g. cranking/ deep cycle.

Ray, the following is self explanatory E-mail, to me from Redarc!
No words have been added, yes some are made BOLD!

(QUOTE)Hello Paul
In answer to your question:-
In our discussions with a large battery manufacturer it was commented that it is IDEAL to use two IDENTICAL batteries in a dual battery system and THEREFORE WE PASS THAT INFORMATION ON TO OUR CUSTOMERS.
We are updating our website and we will remove the confusion.
Thanks for letting me know.
Please let me know if you require further assistance.
Kind regards
Anthony Kittel
Managing Director
REDARC Electronics(end quote)

Ray,
Good to read you are interested, prepared to compromise and not worried, as the truth and facts should be readily available so people can make educated decisions, based on facts not personal opinions, nothing more and nothing less.
Hope this puts out a clear message only to those interested!!

0
FollowupID: 373861

Follow Up By: Mad Dog (Australia) - Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 21:53

Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 21:53
Electronic or mechanical it doesn't matter, they are just switches.

It would appear that Redarc have added some confusion with the new instruction sheet conflicting with some website info.
0
FollowupID: 373862

Follow Up By: Mainey (WA) - Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 22:27

Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 22:27
Ray,
That’s the problem "it does matter"
It's how the switch actually works that in question, not who makes it.

I'm sorry you’re confused, and as you said, that redarc can't get their facts presented correctly with their conflicting information.

Many guys read manufacturers web sites, for technical information, prior to investing in products, if you are confused what hope have those that have no 4WD experience at all? As I said I’m sorry you’re still confused, IMO nothing I can do will clear up the matter for you further.
0
FollowupID: 373874

Follow Up By: Mad Dog (Australia) - Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 22:44

Sunday, Jul 03, 2005 at 22:44
They are both switches Mainey and how they are made has a big influence on how they perform. There is good and bad design in both electronics and mechanics. There is very little difference in performance between a good electronic switch and a good mechanical switch. There is compromise in most things, mostly dictated by price.

I'm not confused. Electronics I understand it's usually mechanics that has me confused :)
0
FollowupID: 373876

Reply By: Topcat (WA) - Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 21:14

Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 21:14
Hi Kelpi, have been using a Rotronics unit for over 15 years now to charge my deep cycle batteries while travelling. The unit has performed trouble free & has fully charged (depending on % of discharge on the deep cycle battery) in a couple of hours travelling after overnight use. The advantage of the unit in a dual battery setup it first checks the charge state of the start battery & will only put a charge to the second battery when the start battery is over 75% fully charged. Cheers
AnswerID: 116433

Reply By: drivesafe - Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 21:14

Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 21:14
H kelpi, this type of question pops up on fairly regular basis and as all ways, the the end question is not whether a solenoid can or can not charge a vehicle battery properly but how on earth can solenoid have any effect on the voltage flowing from point A to point B other than switching the voltage on and off.

For a system that incorporates a solenoid as it’s main control device and not be able to charge a battery to a full charge then the problem is NOT the solenoid but something related to the over all charging system.

If it is a smart relay or solenoid then it may be the electronics backing it, or it could be the type and / or way the cabling is connected between the two batteries, or it could be that the vehicle’s alternator and / or voltage regulator may not be functioning properly.

The point is a solenoid can not do any more than switch the power on and off, it has no magical way of actually effecting a change in the voltage level as it flows from point A to point B.

A solenoid controlled device is only as good as the power supply provided to it.

Cheers
AnswerID: 116434

Follow Up By: Mad Dog (Australia) - Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 22:16

Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 22:16
Excellent summation drivesafe. Would you same the same about the electronic units on the market, they are only electronic switches aren't they?
0
FollowupID: 371958

Follow Up By: brett - Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 22:44

Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 22:44
Drivesafe has summed it up . Some isolators claim to be electronic and people assume the switching is done electronically, this is not always the case, Piranha is an electronic one but open it up and you will see relays, only electronics involved is to control the relays on or off. Anything that switches electronically will use Mosfets which have a very low voltage drop, but to switch 100A they will need to dissipate some heat so you will see some sort of heatsink on the unit. Apart from the Jaycar kit I haven't seen any Mosfet switched isolators. There may be some out there though.
0
FollowupID: 371966

Follow Up By: Gordon from Black River 4wd Club Inc - Monday, Jun 20, 2005 at 13:49

Monday, Jun 20, 2005 at 13:49
Drivesafe,

I fear you have not taken account of the burning of the contacts and the reduced voltage as a result.

My experience has been a voltage drop of around .5 volt with a brand new solenoid compared to only .05 with Rotronics.

You only get what you pay for and I guess thats ok for some

Gordon.
0
FollowupID: 372029

Follow Up By: drivesafe - Monday, Jun 20, 2005 at 16:01

Monday, Jun 20, 2005 at 16:01
Hi Gordon, in over 30 years of working with tens of thousands of relays ( automotive and otherwise ) I have never come across a .5 voltage drop over the contacts of a new relay.

There must have been a problem with the device to cause that in the first place and yes after prolonged use if not used properly, relays can end up with burnt contacts, but from experience, if good quality relays and used set up properly relays will last for decades literally.

Cheers.
0
FollowupID: 372068

Follow Up By: Mainey (WA) - Thursday, Jun 23, 2005 at 18:36

Thursday, Jun 23, 2005 at 18:36
brett posted this followup
(Quote)Some isolators claim to be electronic and people assume the switching is done electronically, this is not always the case, Piranha is an electronic one but open it up and you will see relays, only electronics involved is to control the relays on or off. Anything that switches electronically will use Mosfets which have a very low voltage drop, but to switch 100A they will need to dissipate some heat so you will see some sort of heatsink on the unit.(end quote)

Brett,
What model Piranha have you seen opened up, as you have described above ?
0
FollowupID: 372586

Follow Up By: brett - Thursday, Jun 23, 2005 at 20:43

Thursday, Jun 23, 2005 at 20:43
Unfortunately I've never seen one opened myself but for a long time i've been very interested to know, so I've asked a few people who own them, most don't know, but I have had one person tell me they had opened theirs up and it contained 2 or 3 relays to do the switching. It was a DBE150. Just from looking at one it doesn't seem possible they would ude Mosfets as there is no heatsinking at all, any mosfet or mosfet's that are capable of switching 150A are going to need a reasonable heatsink. If you own a Piranha please have a look inside and let me know what you see, I could be wrong but I doubt it. The other resason I think this is I've also been told the Piranha is made by GSL, I have one of their electronic isolators and the switching in that is done by 3 relays in parallel. The only electronic bit about it is it has electronic current overload protection.
0
FollowupID: 372604

Reply By: brett - Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 21:43

Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 21:43
Unless your using the rotronics that independently charges the main and aux it's going to be no different to any other isolator what ever brand. Just about every isolator on the market has a relay or solenoid (same thing) that joins your 2 batteries together. Even Piranha's so called electronic isolator has a relay inside it to connect the two. The rotonics independent charge isolator may give a better result due to it charging only one battery at a time, but the downside of this is your alternator is no longer connected to your main battery and if your isolator fails you will get no charge to any battery. At least with the other systems worst case is your aux battery won't charge, your main is not affected by a failure.
AnswerID: 116448

Reply By: Willem - Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 22:03

Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 22:03
My Rotronics Battery Isolator died two months ago after working well for two and a half years. I am now running the batteries in parallel and turn the fridge off at night. Will be contacting Rotronics when I get back home from this trip I am on.
AnswerID: 116453

Follow Up By: Mad Dog (Australia) - Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 22:20

Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 22:20
I'm sure they'll look after you well Willem. The more added complexity with electronics the higher the risk of failure.
0
FollowupID: 371961

Follow Up By: drivesafe - Thursday, Jun 23, 2005 at 22:45

Thursday, Jun 23, 2005 at 22:45
Hi Mad Dog and sorry I didn’t reply to your last post. I missed it at the time.

Labelling charge controllers as being electronic is correct whether it is electronics controlling a relay or mosfets, it’s still an electronic isolator, charge controller or what ever you want to call it.

The power is switched by either a relay or by mosfets but both types are still electronic if they are dependant on electronics to monitor the voltage and switch the relay or mosfets.

As to you last post, the more electronics that are used, IF they are designed properly in the first place, should make the overall device more functional and more reliable.

It’s a known fact that electronic devices are more that 100 times more reliable than a mechanical device and as a relay is an electro mechanical device and have been around for well over 100 years now, they have not only proven them selves to be up to most tasks they used for, but they fall into the same reliability as pure electronic devices.

There are benefits and draw backs with both type of controllers.

Cheers
0
FollowupID: 372616

Reply By: drivesafe - Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 23:28

Sunday, Jun 19, 2005 at 23:28
Hi folks, if you use a good quality relay based smart charger and the vehicles alternator is up to it, there is no reason why you can’t charge up to three batteries at the same time and get all three up to full charge ( depending on how you use the batteries and then how much time you drive for ) using your standard vehicle alternator and regulator.

You may get some small advantages by putting in some special type of controller that MAY get you an additional 5% out of an auxiliary battery ( and even this small amount is questionable ) whereas for a far lower cost you could simply install another auxiliary battery and give yourself a minimum of 80% additional storage capacity and remember that as you are charging all three batteries at the same time, you are going to have this additional power in a shorter charging time.

Just some food for thought, cheers
AnswerID: 116473

Reply By: Member - Collyn R (WA) - Monday, Jun 20, 2005 at 13:02

Monday, Jun 20, 2005 at 13:02
I think there may be some confusion here.

Firstly, starting a car engine typically needs less than 3 amp/hours. This energy is replaced by the alternator within 30-60 seconds.

Secondly, a solenoid is simply a switch. It will not affect the voltage that is fed to the auxiliary battery when it closes.

Thirdly a standard alternator/regulator is set at 14.2-14.4 volts. This is insufficient to charge conventional batteries much beyond 70% within reasonable driving time.

There is an argument for the Rotronics in that it separates the auxiliary battery from the starter battery and this has some benefit in that the regulator sees only the latter's voltage and charges accordingly - but the difference is minor.

There are various other solutions.

One is that an AGM battery charges to 100% at as little as 14.1 volts - and quickly. But you do need to use a Redarc or similar a AGMs charges so easily they otherwise initially gobble up the starter batteries share, possibly leaving either or both too low for starting. If doing this it's best to switch out the AGM when it's not needed as they do not need (or indeed like) continuous float charging.

The next one is more complex but works really well. This is to run a small inverter from the vehicle 12-volt system and use that to power a good three-stage battery charger. The charger can also be used where's mains power. This is electrically inefficient but a lot sight less so than trying to push amps with not enough volts.

Yet another way is an interesting new development from NZ that in effect takes the alternator output to well over 15 volts and charges via a varying width pulse, sensing the required voltage by monitoring current flow.

I am about to trial one and will place the results on my own website when I've done so (address is as email except its www.caravan etc...

The TWC three-stage regulator on my OKA works in much the same way except the TWC units pulses are twelve minutes long. It can and does safely charge at up to 100 amps. Oh yes - the Redarc. It's a rugged device, super-easy to fit and works well as long as you accept 70% charging. Or use an AGM (or gel cell).

Finally - how good it is to hear of people using proper-sized cable! 16 sq mm is by no means overkill.
Collyn Rivers

AnswerID: 116523

Follow Up By: brett - Monday, Jun 20, 2005 at 21:00

Monday, Jun 20, 2005 at 21:00
Colin, what's the reason behind only the 70% charge. I've found that after several hours driving the battery voltage is up around 14.2 and taking minimal current, as in less than 1 amp. When I get home I can put my battery charger on it and it goes into float mode of aprox 14.1v with only drawing less than 1 amp. To me when a battery is only drawing 500mA it must be near to full. I can't see the difference between the 14.2V output by an alternator compared to the 14.2V out of a voltage regulated 3 stage charger. The only difference I see is time maybe.Interested in your thoughts on this
0
FollowupID: 372123

Reply By: 4X4Treker - Monday, Jun 20, 2005 at 20:41

Monday, Jun 20, 2005 at 20:41
Boy does this subject start some conversation or what.
My background is in electrical and electronics and the statement of keep it simple stupid to me is the best. I have just taken my 4.2P Maverick of 15years up to the top paddock for some well earned rest and the system that I used in it was dual Overlanders with a 100amp Bosh solinoid that used to close once the alternator was charging. This system incorporated 35mm cable between the batteries on both the positive and negative sides as well as 35mm cable to both the body and chasis and starter motor, and to finnish it off I had 10mm cable from the alternator to the primary battery, basically if you keep the cable resistance between the alternator and the batteries as low as possible then the batteries will equalise in charge.
I have placed the same system on my new GUIV Partol with one minor change in that the Bosh solinoid closes as soon as the Ignition is turned on as I could not use the same as before as it upset the indications on the instrument panel (Alternator, ABS, Seat belt etc warning lights) never mind still working on that one.
I have not had any problems on the new one with the Aux battery not fully charging , so as I said befor keep it simple but also big is best on the cable size.

Cheers
Treker
AnswerID: 116605

Reply By: Member - Collyn R (WA) - Wednesday, Jun 22, 2005 at 17:54

Wednesday, Jun 22, 2005 at 17:54
Brett
With constant voltage charging, the charge rate automatically tapers as battery voltage approaches the charge voltage. Given long enough (like a day or two constant running) a starter battery may approach 80% or so, but to exceed that requires around 15 volts. AGMs are a different matter - they charge close to 100% at 14.1 volts or even less.

I'm surprised your three-stage charger goes into float mode at 14.2 volts. Does it have any programmable functions?
Collyn Rivers
AnswerID: 116932

Sponsored Links