Monday, Dec 30, 2024 at 18:43
.
TrevorDavid, What on earth are you on about?
I did
not say that "the product is
not providing expected performance".
I said..."each of these "mentions" is an appeal for assistance with a product that is
not providing expected performance."
Let me spell it out for you ...."An APPEAL for ASSISTANCE with a product that is
not PROVIDING EXPECTED PERFORMANCE". Obviously the product is
NOT PROVIDING expected performance TO THE USER or he would
not be seeking help. So please stop trying to twist what I said into something else. It is
not "harsh". It is a statement of fact.
I acknowledged that that Traveller was an excellent product.... I said that David had "hit the jackpot".
And what do you mean that my response is critical of something which is of no interest to me? How on earth can you know if the product has, or has
not, interest for me?
And yes, "
ExplorOz Traveller probably goes a long way to funding both." That is exactly the point I made at the beginning of my post and the whole crux of my post.
Do you actually read and absorb what I wrote or do you just seize upon a few words, take them right out of context, and construct some inappropriate argument aimed at misconstruing what I had posted. Your motives elude me!
FollowupID:
927901