Sunday, Nov 19, 2023 at 14:04
It is not unusual for resource companies to buy pastoral properties where they have an interest. Makes life easier for them. And they may lease it back to the original owner, sometimes at a peppercorn rent.
As far as reducing access and the donation of the land to Parks is concerned, this is a glass half full or glass half empty issue.
The previous owners could have closed it completely to reduce their public liability risks. The new owners could have done the same. They didn't and they should be praised for that, instead of being criticised.
Like Stephen, I visited regularly from about 60 years ago. Last time was about 5 years ago and it is unlikely we would return, preferring some of the lesser known spots.
Cheers,
Peter
OKA196 motorhome
FollowupID:
924890