Thursday, Jun 24, 2004 at 15:22
Hi Haysie,
If you had done a search, there is a HUGE amount on the BFG vs Coopers debate. But for your convinience, below is a copy of my previous response, I just happen to have run 33" BFG's and 285/75 (33") Cooper ST's.
----------------------------------------------------------------
I have 285/75 Cooper ST's on my Nissan and previously had 33x10.5 R15 BFG TA KO's on my 80 series. I ran BFG's exclusively on the 80 series for 10 years and they were great. However, the last 6 BFG KO's were non-USA made and I had several problems with them. Thats when I decided to try the Cooper ST's.
I have found the COOPERS to be as good, if not better, on-road and much better off-road. I have had then for 18K now and am very happy with the change. But they are noticeably noiser when the window is down on smooth bitumen (but don't really notice if window is up) I tow a 1.6T off-road van and add a fully loaded GU and I would also be very heavily loaded (too scared to put on weigbridge!!!).
I have monitored the wear at 5K intervals and at last rotation they were down to an average 13.5-14.0mm (started 15mm). They have worn very flat (less than 0.5mm variation across the face) and my typical tyre pressure is 35/40 when touring and 35/35 general driving.
I had one issue with the LR tyre when one complete lug tore off, but it was replaced under warranty (15,500kms) with a new tyre. The tyre also had bruising where the lug was torn and was most likely caused by a large
rock that did not give. COOPERS said to run lower (~30 psi) when offorad as the carcass is very stiff and too high a pressure will not allow the tyre to "mould" around say a
rock. Given the bruising on the carcass, I was suprised I got given a new tyre, but they said they stand by their product!!! Could not complain at all about that.
So, while others will have different stories about the great BFG vs COOPERS debate, I am happy that I changed camps (just like my Toyota to Nissan change - gotta try for yourself, otherwise its just an opinion!!!)
Cheers
Captain
AnswerID:
64870
Follow Up By: Bonz (Vic) - Thursday, Jun 24, 2004 at 22:59
Thursday, Jun 24, 2004 at 22:59
didya notice much difference in the gearing with the 285's Capt'n?
FollowupID:
325975
Follow Up By: Member - Captain (WA) - Thursday, Jun 24, 2004 at 23:42
Thursday, Jun 24, 2004 at 23:42
Hi ya Bonz,
Gotta be honest, drove straight from the dealer to the tyre
shop (only 30km drive) so don't have any real experience with the 265/70's. But I got a dtronic on it, so take -7% on the gearing, add +20% for the Dtronic and I'm way in front.
But having had the vehicle for 18,000kms now, the gearing feels spot on anyway. The only problem I have is the low range gearing. But thats a function of the 2.0:1 low range reduction, not the 285 tyres.
I wouldn't go back from the 285's, the off-road improvement is definetly worth any perceived gearing issues IMHO (not that I have any gearing issues).
Cheers
Captain
FollowupID:
325982