Tuesday, Dec 17, 2019 at 20:48
Hah, Michelle! You're a victim of your own success. I have found the app so intuitive that I've never had to look at instructions to find out how to work it, so the ? mark on some pages never really registered on me.
Besides, I am of the male variety and you must know that the last resource we of that kind resort to is the manual :-)
More seriously, I can see from your email the issues you face.
I'm no expert in these things, but could you do the instructions in HTML and keep them within the app? That way graphics would be retained,and they would be readable in any device as AFAIK all devices have a browser of some sort. I have some Windows desktop apps/programs that have off-line or self-contained searchable help files - old ones from the days when fast internet was not ubiquitous. The technique might be useful here. I seem to recall a .chm filetype. Is this technique Windows-specific or is it transportable somehow?
If it is transportable you could perhaps retain the ? mark, context sensitive interface where appropriate.
If you cannot do the above I find it hard to chose between keeping the current built-in help and the richer, outside-the-app .pdf help file.
If you have to go for a .pdf help file outside the app, I don't think that would be unreasonable. PDF files are ubiquitous these days and consequently I don't think it's unreasonable to expect users to have a PDF reader of some kind installed, and if they haven't, to get it. There are plenty and they are free.
But then you would lose the context-sensitive ? mark facility.
Would it be unreasonable to have a text-only help file within the app as you do now (with the context-sensitive ? mark facility) and an optional external .pdf file with bells and whistles for those that want it - both with the same text but the internal one without the graphics, etc?
Cheers
FollowupID:
903868