Wednesday, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:43
Siringo - The marking of the survey post appears to translate differently to my perception of what I can see in your photo.
I see the first letters/numbers as "MK" (with the M and K joined at the vertical line), and "16".
Failing any input from our resident surveyor, Stephen L - I'll take a stab at what the survey marker may be.
I couldn't be sure if it's a pastoral
boundary marker, or some other boundary line or road survey marker - but I'm guessing the "MK" is the surveyors initials, and the "16" is a consecutive number in the survey marker numbers, starting from his original start point, or bench mark.
The broad arrow is the symbol for Govt property, or a Govt-initiated project. Thus, the marker identifies as a Govt survey, or the boundary of some specific Govt property, such as Defence Land.
The "1962" is self-explanatory, of course, it's the date the survey marker was installed.
Can't advise anything on the "Talford, Green" names. Could be additional survey team members?
Here's an informative 2015 article from the W.A. Dept of Lands, as regards early survey markers. It's important to ensure all survey markers are preserved.
I'm presuming S.A. uses similar survey markers, but there would be local variations. Stephen L will be able to enlighten us, no doubt.
W.A. - Survey marks in pastoral areas
Re the capped PVC casing - this could either be a mining company exploration drillhole - or a Govt water
reserves exploration drillhole.
The State Govts often carry out drilling programmes to assess the size of water aquifers in many areas for towns and communities, or for specific large project requirements.
The fact that the hole is capped is indicative that the original drilling organisation wants the hole protected, and possibly checked again at some future time, to see if there is a variation in the water levels, or water quality in the drill hole.
It's unusual for mining companies to cap boreholes - unless they find a source of good potable water - which they will then mark on mining maps for potential use, and to also supply underground water
reserves data to the relevant State Govt Water authority.
The fact that the drillhole is located in a remote position is unusual, and would appear to possibly indicate a National aquifer resource investigation.
Anyway, that's my .02c worth for today.
Cheers, Ron.
AnswerID:
626388
Follow Up By: Siringo - Monday, Jul 01, 2019 at 08:21
Monday, Jul 01, 2019 at 08:21
Thanks Ron, yes that does look more like MK. When at the marker I thought it looked like TK as in Track, but I think MK is correct.
FollowupID:
900273