Monday, Aug 14, 2017 at 14:40
Ron, Thanks for the reply.
I did go through the process of eliminating along the way, the manufacturers of dual cabs that for one reason or another didn't quite fit the bill. It pretty much came down to the D-Max, Hilux and Ranger/BT50. As someone who has spent most of his adult life putting bread on the table by pulling spanners I did have to try and ignore my bias against the Ford offering and approach it from the POV that under the skin it is basically a Mazda. I do regard their products as being quite good. The only reason Mazda didn't a get start and the Ford did, was that their closest dealer was a fair trek away compared to the other three mentioned brands.
Both the wife and I found the
Ranger to be slightly ahead from an ergonomic perspective.
My son is the maintenance superintendent at one of the
Pilbara iron ore port loading docks so I ran the prospective purchase past him and asked him to have a bit of a chat with one of the light vehicle supervisors. Apparently they have replaced their mainly Toyota fleet with Rangers. This was because of the requirement of the 5 or 6 star safety rating. At the time, a few years ago, the Hilux current model didn't meet the required rating, whatever that was.
Obviously the environment, multiple users and general work they are subjected to will not be all that relevant to what I will be needing, but it's still nice to know how they are standing up.
From what my
young bloke was told the Rangers are experiencing a fair bit more down time compared to the previous model Hiluxes. Mostly from electronic issues. Now this may just be lack of familiarity with the new vehicles by the maintenance guys and gals, but.......???? and I am certainly not trying to say that the Toyota fleet was trouble free.
Cheers
Pop
FollowupID:
883446