Tuesday, May 02, 2017 at 18:18
No, I did say "test question" and not trick question for a good reason. And the fuse rating - if selected in accordance with Redarc's suggestions - shouldn't enter the discussion. (Nor should the alternator connection, unless someone want to place it other than to the cranking battery terminals.) It was to survey whether others saw it as OK or problematic.
Note the title of the Redarc PDF file - "the-ultimate-dual-battery-setup".
I'm in the same boat as Boobook - I did ask Redarc the same question some time back (although I had no plans to do it at that time). They advised back then that it was OK to
bridge the input and output of a BCDC unit of the types listed on that diagram ( I use a BCDC1220-IGN). But recently that diagram came up again in discussion, so I emailed them.
I had been waiting, holding off responding until the Leigh or AllanB types made a comment, and for a further reply from Redarc. But I will throw in my 2p worth here anyway.
The DC-DC charger will be trying to output the voltage for the stage of charge of the auxiliary battery, for the sake of argument pick 14.1V in boost. The main/cranking battery can be whatever it is at the time.
Now you parallel the two batteries via the solenoid. That dictates that their terminal voltages are the same (excluding volt drop caused by current flowing BETWEEN THEM). So now you have the BCDC trying to deliver a set voltage to a pair of batteries that are feeding it.
If the alternator is (a) not running - you're trying to "jump-start" from the aux - or (b) not delivering that 14.1V figure, then the BCDC will be outputting its max output current trying to lift the two batteries to 14.1V FROM THOSE SAME TWO BATTERIES. Almost a perpetual motion machine but with losses of course. (If the alternator output IS above 14.1V I'd expect the BCDC to accept that without drama, although again I don't know as it would try to go to a float voltage.)
To quote Phil above: "But that doesn't sound logical to me. I don't know if that is a problem or not." Those were my thoughts, as the discussion I saw recently related not to jump-starting but for WINCHING.
When I put the question to Redarc last month: "Can you please assure us that the configuration shown in that diagram is definitely safe and functional." their reply - which I won't quote verbatim as I don't have that permission - was that it was an error and the models listed were incorrect (for that task?). While they hadn't tested it, they couldn't assure it was OK.
That's where it sits. I don't know, Redarc have clearly seen a problem now, and I for one won't be trying it out and risking the magic smoke getting out of my BCDC. If I hear any more from Redarc I will update this thread.
FollowupID:
880713