Thursday, Mar 03, 2016 at 17:43
.
"Allan seems to forget....etc."??? No not at all.
Ron, when it comes to safety, Allan doesn't "forget" anything. To work in hazardous industries for as many years as I did and survive probably means I was doing something right.
The essential element of safe behaviour is to always minimise your risk. That does not mean that you can always totally eliminate risk, but you can minimise it and improve your odds of remaining safe.
To introduce expressions of there being "date-expired LPG bottles' on the road has nothing whatever to do with the subject anymore than there are Inland Taipans in the areas we travel and
camp. To do so perhaps indicates that your argument in opposition is weak and idefensible. We are speaking of butane canister powered stoves, not getting run-over-by-a-bus etc.
Certainly you could have accidents with bottle & hose connected stoves or even with a wood-fueler campfire but my point of view is that these canister systems are manufactured down to a low price and rely on a complex safety device to protect the user from potential injury. Far better to have a robust design which is intrinsically safe, allowing of course for adequate maintenance. There is always opportunity for irresponsible maintenance or operation, but removing any potentially unsafe element or component improves your odds of not having an incident.
I my opinion, bottle & hose stoves, if
well selected and maintained, are reasonably robust appliances unlikely to inflict injury.
Canister stoves on the other hand are cheap appliances of flimsy construction with tinplate fuel canisters containing a lot of energy. They have small margins of safety.
But, it is of course, only my opinion. Use whatever you like..... just don't expect me to come within 5 metres of it when lit.
FollowupID:
865904