Sunday, Oct 05, 2014 at 13:04
Batts...... might pay to read my post again.
As I said "and really offer no advantages unless you drive in mud"
Many M/T tyres have softer sidewalls then many of the better off road style A/T's due to the design nature of them plus more open tread block making them more
puncture prone, can't beat thicker rubber to stop a punture...... a M/T tyre you want it to conform to the surface it's transversing by offering more flex as opposed to an A/T tyre where you want less deformation and flex helping to make the tyre more stable at higher speeds.
As with most M/T and A/T tyres some have more strength then others.
Toyo Open Country M/T are my choice of tyre but when we went to the 200 series Landcruiser we ended up going to Mickey Thompson MTZ as Toyo don't bring a tyre into Australia that suited the 200 series so had to goto the MTZ's due to the rave reviews they had...... How wrong I was.
It made the 200 series very unstable and dangerous to drive due to tyre flex..... after 20,000k changed to Cooper ST Maxx and could not be happier, they have performed above my expectations in all conditions including 500 kilometers of soft mud and sticky clay driving on one trip (had camper trailer travelling 90 deg to the Land cruiser slippery.)
Getting back to choosing an M/T over an A/T...... most get carried away with the fact less then 1 percent of their driving a M/T will offer a slight advantage...... for the other 99 percent it offers a disadvantage.
After running a more aggressive A/T tyre there is no way I would go back to a M/T tyre again unless I was going to play in the mud for over 40 percent of my driving.
FollowupID:
825617