Monday, Apr 14, 2014 at 08:59
Got to love people who don't look at the WHOLE picture, the Iphone rated equal 4th out of twenty phones and only just missed coming third by a a few points....... yes way behind WHAT?
To say it doesn't receive as good as the 4S is like saying a 200 series landcruiser isn't as good as a 60 series in .00001% of off roading but is better in every other aspect.
If you look at the durability numbers the phone that came 2nd only got a score of 50 out of 100 and the phone that came in third could only get a score of 75 out of 100 with sound quality 9 points behind the iPhone....... the iPhone got 100 out of 100 for durability.
No use having a phone with the best reception iif the durability isn't their and you can't make phone calls because it had failed.
It would of been nice for them to print what criteria and parameters they used to obtain this data and what the difference was in measurable units .... was the winning phone 5cm's, 5m's or 5km's better.
We have two iPhone 5's and the reception between the two is different but not one is better then the other.
If they used the iPhone 4s in place of the 5 where would of scored ?...... you have to remember the 4s was judged along with the current phones of that time so the score it obtained can not be used as proof it is any better then the iPhone 5.
FollowupID:
813450