Tuesday, Dec 10, 2013 at 22:49
Brand names aside, I have no favourite of the two and make no bones regarding your choice, my point is to do with the brute cooling capacity of the unit.
Quote"I didn't care (or
test) how long the Waeco took from ambient to cold.
I was more than happy to upgrade it.
When you consider the normal practice of starting the fridge the day before departure then loading it up, the length of time to achieve this is somewhat irrelevant."Unquote
The length of time it takes to get there is most relevant as it is this time multiplied by the current draw that determines the total Ah of the unit. A larger instantaneous current does not necessarily mean a larger daily Ah draw.
Quote "Once a fridge has reached the selected cold operating temperature, it is then simply a matter of maintaining that temperature." Unquote
It is how much running the compressor does to achieve and then maintain this temperature that is important, especially when warm weather, adding warm product and door openings are taken into account.
This is why the duty cycle matters.
A compressor running for 22 hours at 2.5 amps will consume the same daily Ah as one running for 10 hours at 5.6 amps, however, whilst your solar was not up to the task for the Waeco (it's even borderline for the Engel), consider a proper setup where the solar capacity is more than adequate for recharging the batteries before the end of the peak sun period, a fridge with a higher draw but a shorter duty cycle will make much better use of excess generating capacity than one that runs
well into the off peak periods.
This means that you will end the day with both a colder fridge and more fully charged batteries.
It will also recover more rapidly from the addition of warm product and door openings than will the lower powered unit.
FollowupID:
804054