Friday, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:24
lets sumarise and address some of the points raised.
#1 and above all .. DO NOT believe or take at face value any of, the only partly founded, commonly held "truths" about batteries in particular AGM.
No matter what the "rule" is there is an AGM or other type of battery that proves the rule is false.
We must look at the detail and the manufacturers spec's
There is one reasonably
well respected Chineese manufacturer of batteries that manufactures and sells the very same battery in three different forms.
AGM (with little or no free electrolite, all the electrolite is contained in the glass mats), Sealed lead acid ( not claimed to be AGM, which is partly filled with electrolite) and as a Flooded wet cell sealed battery.
All three batteries use the same case, plate structure and materials .... all that varies is the amount of electrolite and some variation in electrolite formular.
The Australian distributor was zipped a few years ago by the ACCC, because there was a batch of partly filled batteries that came into the country and where sold as AGM when they technically where not ..... nothing wrong with the batteries as such , they just where not as discribed.
That manufacturer also builds a range of batteries with differing performance, they make a low current AGM battery that has a maximum initial charge rate of around 20 amps for a 100AH battery ( this battery also has poor high temperature tolerance) they also make a nearly identical range of batteries that has a much higher Maximum initial charge rate around the 50 amps for a 100AH battery and a full blown Cranking battery that makes a lie of every rule about AGM you have ever been told.
This cranking AGM can be charged very hard, its Cold Cranking Amps will make pretty much any conventional battery look sad and they have high temperature tolerance for under bonnet applications.
Generalisations about batteries can be very misleading .... you must consider each battery on it's merits and look at the specifcations.
2/ Do not confuse "Maximum Initial Charge Current" and "Charge Acceptance".
Maximum charge rate is determined by several factors, but it is the limit of how much charge current the battery will tolerate without damage.
Charge acceptance is how much charge the battery will accept and continue to accept.
Two hypothetical batteries ...... both at the same state of charge and condition, both at the same charge voltage and both starting at the same initial charge rate ... all equal to save confusion.
The battery with better "Charge Acceptance" will continue to accept charge at a higher rate as the batteries state of charge rises. ....... it will reach a higher state of charge faster from a given charging source.
The fact that the battery with better charge acceptace MAY ( but not always) achieve higher charge current from a given charge voltage is another issue .... not a seperate issue but another issue.
Charge acceptance is not exclusivly tied to internal resistance ... but it is related.
Saying that Charge acceptance is governed by heat and lead purity is a bit of a stretch.
Saying that charge acceptance and a number of other things are directly related to plate thickness is also a bit of a stretch.
Manufacturers are doing some clever things with plate structures and battery metallurgy and chemistry that make the old plate thickness arguments less and less valid ... not invalid , but less and less of a factor.
One thing that most definitely does influence Charge acceptance in all batteries is, ..... age and condition.
As batteries suffer age and abuse, their charge acceptance suffers ... and badly.
Sometimes this can be recovered a little with good treatment, but all batteries will eventually die from the same things that cause this.
I have had a not fully discharged, mildly neglected N70 marine battery take 3 days to reach full charge on a good 5 amp multistage charger, where a healthy example would recharge in 24 hours from neatly stone flat.
That battery did recover reasonably to live another year in light use.
3/... as for the 200Ah battery .... yeh hell ya don't want to be lifting that ..... most applications that 12V 200AH capacity will be made up of two batteries.
Look at trucks, busses, golf buggies and most small to medium earth moving ...... pretty much all broken down into 12v 100 AH or 6 volt 200AH packages or there abouts.
either two 12 v batteries in paralell or two 6 volt batteries in series
The other thing to consider is the N70 size battery is the most common and bang for bucks battery on the planet, because everything uses them, ya more likley to chisel a deal on an N70 than any other battery .... you will have more choice and a better chance of it being in stock.
4/ DC to DC chargers V direct charging from an alternator.
The notion that you can not or will not fully charge any given battery from an alternator is just rubbish, this is proven untrue in both theory and practice.
To compare the two methods of charging and the erroneous insistences we need to look at detail.
A/ ..... One of the contentions here is what is being considered "Fully Charged" and how is this being measured.
IF you take a battery that has been charged as far as it will on pretty much any given car alternator, then put it on a multi-stage "smart" charger, it probably wont read as fully charged .... WHY .... because the so called "smart" charger is making various assumptions and it's end of charge detection may
well be at a higher voltage that the alternators charge voltage.
It must be understood that one of the ways multi-stage chargers ( including DC to DC chargers) stick charge to batteries as fast as they do is using voltages that simply would not be safe on a constant rate charger ..... some will push 16Volts in boost charge mode.
Any argument about state of charge has to discuss how that state of charge is being assessed ...... there are only two valid and accurate ways ..... steady state resting terminal voltage ( after the battery has been rested at least 1 hour preferably 4 hours) and electrolite specific gravity.
B/ ... Some batteries require higher charging voltages or require higher charging voltages when they are in certain conditions.
Many older car alternators where regulated at 13.8 volts, this is not sufficient for some ( but not all) batteries.
but those are not the major concern in many situations.
THE major concern
IF I have a 200AH battery and all my cabling is adequate ....... I have a DC to DC charger that is capable of delivering 20 amps .... that battery is at 50% SOC ... it will, take about 6 to 8 hours driving to " fully charge" that battery given charging losses and charge tapering.
In 2 or 3 hours it will not come close to fully charging that battery.
IF however I have the same battery on adequate cabling, being charged from an alternator capable or 120 amps ...... we will start by kicking in 50 or 60 amps and then drop back to 20 or 30 amps as the SOC increases.
In 2 or 3 hours driving the battery will be in a better state of charge being charged direct from an alternator than via a 20 amp DC to DC charger ..... assuming the battery will tolerate the Charge current and has sufficient charge acceptance.
C/ much of the blame for batteries not getting charge, can be due to inadequate cabling ...... cable size is more often than not underestimated.
D/ THE most common reason for batteries failing to charge and failing prematurely ..... is inaddequate charging time ....... no matter what battery or charging system, you cant hammer a battery all night and expect it to come back to full charge in 2 or 3 hours driving.
5/ OH and remember ALL batteries should be house in a situation where they are
well ventilated, and acid leakage is considered an inevitable fact.
cheers
AnswerID:
612507
Follow Up By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Saturday, Jul 15, 2017 at 09:22
Saturday, Jul 15, 2017 at 09:22
.
Ahhh, The Lead acid Battery........"PLANTE'S BOX of MISCONCEPTIONS"
It contains enough mystique to confound the audience for a millennium.
But The Bantam has delved deeply into its viscera and is witness to its secrets.
He is to be believed ----------- seriously.
FollowupID:
882775
Follow Up By: Tim F3 - Saturday, Jul 15, 2017 at 09:44
Saturday, Jul 15, 2017 at 09:44
Bantam thankyou for your exceptionally detailed response.
Slightly off the track might you consider this question.
If we are charging from a 2002 model landcruiser (not present day smart alternater ) 100 amp deep cycle batteries from 50 % soc....
Say a charging time of 2 hours ...if only one x 100 battery or if say 2 x 100 amp auxillary batteries , would the example of 2 batteries adsorb more energy (amps ) than the single battery being charged ?
ie..which example would receive the greater charge and power a load the longest ??
FollowupID:
882776
Follow Up By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Saturday, Jul 15, 2017 at 09:52
Saturday, Jul 15, 2017 at 09:52
Tim, I have a proven answer to that, but I'll let Bantam go first.
FollowupID:
882777
Follow Up By: Tim F3 - Saturday, Jul 15, 2017 at 09:58
Saturday, Jul 15, 2017 at 09:58
Will wait for the replies and learn.
FollowupID:
882778
Follow Up By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Saturday, Jul 15, 2017 at 11:50
Saturday, Jul 15, 2017 at 11:50
.
Tim, the Bantam seems to have gone fishing, so I'll go ahead.........
In your given time of 2 hours, if the alternator supplies say 20 Amps you will have contributed 40Ah to a single battery.
If you charge two batteries simultaneously from the alternator, and it is capable of supplying 20 Amps to each, then the contribution will be 40 plus 40 = 80 Ah in total.
So you now have doubled the amount of stored energy to power your load.
In the case of my own vehicle and charging system, the 120A alternator feeds two auxiliary batteries, each with its own 20A dc-dc charger. So they are “looked after” by good individual charging programs contributing a safely controlled optimum charge rate.
While the engine is running, a relay transfers the auxiliary load directly to the alternator so that the chargers do not support that load.
When the engine is ‘at rest’ the two batteries are joined by a relay to equally contribute to the auxiliary load.
This system has served me
well. In my camping style, I am never at rest for more than a several days and the 220Ah storage easily maintains the fridge and a few small loads for that time. Full recharge is usually achieved within 4 hours driving time.
The batteries are now 6 years old and seem to be performing adequately.
FollowupID:
882780
Follow Up By: The Bantam - Sunday, Jul 16, 2017 at 10:58
Sunday, Jul 16, 2017 at 10:58
Yeh I went working then dancing ...... must go fishing some time soon.
IN theory of you charge two batteries in parallel directly from an adequate charging source, you will store more charge than a single battery of the same size.
BUT that assumes that your cabling delivers charge and discharge equally.
Very small differences in cable resistance can result in charging favoring one battery over the other ...... in the short term you will still pack more charge but if the cable path is not equal one battery will get lazy and fail before the other.
This is why Allan is charging each battery independently
The question is ...... is that 2 hours adequate to replace what has been drawn overnight pluss charging losses.
THIS is the predominating problem in caravan and touring battery use.
Thousands of batteries die each year because people simply do not put back more than they take out of their batteries day after day after day.
No matter how expensive or how big your batteries are they will die in a very short time.
cheers
FollowupID:
882791
Follow Up By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Sunday, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:33
Sunday, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:33
.
Bantam, I'm not much good at either dancing or fishing. You have my admiration.
Yes, in my example I necessarily assumed equal distribution of the charging current and ideally identical batteries etc.
I think Tim's expression of "2 hours" was a notional period but you are of course correct about adequate recharging. I have a pair of Volt/Amp meters on the dash and am reassured when I see the charge current diminishing in its final stage as an indication of approaching battery 'fulfilment'. I consider it a more useful guide than pondering over terminal voltage at various states of the battery.
Because my system is arranged to bypass the load currents past the chargers, the charger algorithm is not disturbed by accessory loads and the ammeter indication truly represents only the charge to the battery.
FollowupID:
882793